this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
475 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30229 readers
2213 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

You mean this rich well connected individual isn't going to burn their friends. You don't say!

[–] fira@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago

Fuck Newsom. Find me a Californian Mamdani dammit!!!

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, we know. We've seen this dog-and-pony show for DECADES.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the problem is that American evangelicalism has tied money and goodness together with the prosperity gospel.

The more money you have, the more gooderer you are, and all you have to do is give all your money to (church/fund/whatever target) and god will give it back to you three-fold!

and there for, being against money by wanting to tax people means you are big evilsatanbad.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

a guy who looks like a sleazy wall street exec, car salesman or television producer doesn't want to tax rich people?????

i never would have guessed!!!

at his best he still looks like an aging patrick bateman.

a big difference between 30+ years ago and now is that the lizards can't hide their tails; clinton and bush looked like normal american men; this dude just walked out of the bourgeoisie salon and has likely memorized his stylist and publicists cell numbers but probably can't remember the name of his sons/daughters.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No way, really?

The guy who changed laws for his rich friends is against his rich friends having to pay comparatively insignificant sum that wont hurt their dragon hordes or its infinite growth in any significant fashion?

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Nothing about Newsom has seemed honest since day 1. He’s just another opportunistic politician.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Fuck newsom in general, but I could see a rational argument that the tax should be national to prevent billionaire Californias from moving to the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

And if he's president, he will say he can't enact the tax because billionaires would flee the US.

We've had the same arguments in France. The economist who proposed the tax actually used data from the US to show that few rich people actually leave the place they're in, because that's where they live, meet people for business or pleasure, etc.

This could be evaluated for California too.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Mamdani proved unequivocally that they won't actually move. Stop giving in to the bullshit billionaires are spouting to try to stop themselves being taxed.

Also, who fucking cares if they leave? Billionaires are a burden to the society and economy of any city or state they live in.

And yes, FUCK NEWSOM! Say it loud and say it proud. NO MORE CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS!!!

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

He's not arguing for that. He wants a national tax that both isn't on the ballot and wouldn't tax billionaires on their wealth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

His hairstyle is so cunty. And when I learned more about him I disliked him more.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

5% tax on about 200 Californian billionaires who hold $2.2 trillion in wealth

5% of 2.2 trillion is $11 billion, right?

Jesus that would end poverty.

[–] demonmariner@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

5% of 2.2 trillion is 0.11 trillion, or 110 billion.

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 3 points 1 day ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

He had me at no a long time ago when he said he "reveres the state of Israel and is proud to support it". The guy is corrupt trash and doesnt belong in the party at all. Kick his rightwing ass out.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 44 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Please don't let this guy be who ends up on the 2028 ticket.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Dont worry, itll be Shapiro or Pritzker.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats just be opening the door for Republicans every election since 2016

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And then they are surprised to be called controlled opposition.

AOC please. I don't even agree with her on every single thing but she's whip-smart and constantly pushing and principled

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›