this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
1100 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30146 readers
2834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, once a figure of contention among leaders from both major political parties, has seen a remarkable surge in his political standing just six months into office.

The 34-year-old democratic socialist, a prominent figure on the progressive left, has garnered unexpected praise from both Donald Trump and New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

He has also emerged as the face of the region's sports renaissance. Now, days before New York's primary elections,

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 245 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Progressives have been hoping for someone like Mamdani to actually win an election for a long time, now. If he is what finally instigates a break in the wall the Democratic party has erected, it's not surprising that others are picking up their sledgehammers.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 4 days ago (30 children)

But leftists are both useless and totally destructive at the same time according to neo-liberals.

I hope this brings enough change to make the Democrats actually progressive instead of giving lips service to it then doubling down on corporatism.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 54 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Who cares if the Dems go progressive? It's the voters who are important. The Republicans kept resisting the rising far right movements like the Tea Party, and then MAGA, but the voters just bulldozed right over them.

The corporatist establishment Democrats all made it extremely clear that they would prefer a corrupt asshole like Adams for Mayor, but the people told them to go fuck themselves, and now the DNC has no choice but to get on board.

The voters don't have to do what the DNC demands, but the DNC has to live with whoever the voters force upon them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

There are Leftists in this thread who are saying Mamdani's no good because he hasn't done everything he promised.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As he should. We need to take any populist progressive momentum we have and use it to run the Democrats out of town. Along with the republicans. The two parties are just a black hole of corporate money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ActualGrapesTasteGreen@piefed.zip 174 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Amazing what electing somebody who wasn't born in the 1940s can do!

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 45 points 4 days ago (19 children)

There are tons of young fascists.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh god. I didn't do this math. This means that the same people in that age bracket were kids glued to the TV during all the McCarthy-era bullshit. No wonder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

To be fair I think this guy has actual talent for this kind of work.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 127 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Electing someone who is actually DOING STUFF for the city he's elected to run? I mean, yeah we should totally hate that. 😩

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago

Yeah, wtf is wrong with Mamdani.

Doesnt he know hes supposed to make big promises, then do none of it while giving handies to CEOs in his office before selling his citizens out for literal pennies per person?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

electing someone who even understands what their job even is seems to be a welcome change. Schumer claims his whole job is keeping the dems in line with what a foreign power wants. And almost all of congress seem sto agree. Thats not their job at all. And that rot goes top to bottom through both parties. The president and judiciary also dont seem to understand what their jobs are anymore. Cops too, no frickin idea what they do exactly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We were surprised to discover that, underneath all the bullshit, people just want happiness, peace and opportunity".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 160 points 4 days ago (133 children)

This is how MAGA took over the republicans.

Now we just have to convince leftists to get out and vote in the primaries and generals which might be a chore.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 4 days ago (23 children)

Except the leftists did vote that's why he's there? Maybe it's because he wasn't a shit tier neo-liberal candidate like the Democrats have put up in the last election.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (132 replies)
[–] abc@suppo.fi 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I'm not partial to some of his politics, but he seems like a genuinely good guy. Both parties need more good and young guys and gals, Republicans most of all, but Democrats too.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (5 children)

With enough people like Mamdani, we could finally advance beyond a two party system.

[–] Brosplosion@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not if it's still FPTP. Spoiler effect is too strong, more split "left" means right wins

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Explains why NYC elected Mamdani with ranked choice voting, then! Any candidate in favor of FPTP wants the right to win.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

We truly is reshaping and healing the state of NYC.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

Good and carry on. The USA needs a progressive left president too.

[–] Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›