this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
95 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

49613 readers
476 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ixoid@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

Heroes on the right side of history.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My grands spinning in their graves fast enough to power every ev on USA roads.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RadicalRebel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] alapakala@quokk.au -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RadicalRebel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone made a bunch of noise about the archive.is/ph/li maintainer being anonymous and how they preferred this for their personal privacy. Knowing this, the individual still felt the need to make noise when there was already was some, which resulted in repercussions. The maintainer even stated they're glad Wikipedia wants to strip archive.is/ph/li of their pages as hopefully it'll lead to Wikipedia archiving their pages themselves.

Due to the functionality needed for archiving, archival sites can be used to substantially increase the success of DDoS attacks. But what's to say they weren't hit with malware and taken over for a while? This is basically one person's word vs another and in the big picture that drama doesn't change how I see the sites function. No one's perfect and I don't expect that of anyone, but the site has worked flawlessly for me. But then again, this is just me, so please feel free to provide an alternative archive of the linked webpage for the post!

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One thing that is being begged over and over during this Trump regime is this: the current separation of powers is not enough. The executive branch needs to be broken down: the president cant be the one who controls who gets prosecuted or not.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Separation of powers doesn't do anything when all branches are controlled by the same ideology.

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

True, and we already see this with the Executive and Legislative branches, and even the Judicial branch (especially the Supreme Court)