this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
747 points (99.1% liked)

News

38040 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Why exactly did we need tariffs on EVs? Because it sure looks like Biden put those in place to protect the business interests of a Nazi who is now a trillionaire.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 124 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have failed not just as a society but as a species by allowing him and all like him to survive this long.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Capitalism is amongst the worst things humanity has ever designed. We’ve not just allowed, but encouraged the rise of the likes of Musk and Thiel, celebrating their success even! Too many people believe the lie; it cannot be modified or replaced. They believe this lie, while idolizing Musk thinking that could be me one day.

[–] topperharlie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The celebration part and the "white knights" defending these cunts using oversimplified logic is what made me lose faith in humanity.

We are really asking so hard to go extinct is not even funny anymore.

Honestly believe extinction or at least some kind of end of life as we know it isn’t that far off.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

We will eventually lose our purpose to the elites. What will they do with us then?

load more comments (1 replies)

I saw someone excusing this with "but they are creating wealth" in the anti consumption subreddit today. We're beyond fucked.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 83 points 1 week ago

UNFORTUNATELY we CANT Tax this TRILLION DOLLARS because it's not REAL money but Also Elon Musk can BUY Countries because it's Real Money!

-Republicans!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Time for some kinetic wealth redistribution.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If we do it now everyone gets $125 and if we exclude everyone who has over $1M we get way more than $125

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t care if it’s $3.50, just as long as Elon Musk is made the example he deserves to be. A single room apartment, with a crappy landlord who never fixes anything, and a job that never allows his head to be above water. He can become the exploited worker he’s always dreamed of.

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago

stopicanonlygetsoerect.gif

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Ah, British insults 🤗

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is a trillionaire now, and people are letting this happen. We should all be in the streets up in arms together and not leave until Elmo musk is brought down to destination

No more billionaires, no more super millionaires, I want wealth caps! Nobody should be worth more than 10 million dollars, any income over that must go straight to taxes, world wide

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What we need to do is ban using securities as loan collateral. That'll end this bullshit in its tracks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i hope his dick falls off in the toilet tonight.

just falls right off. no trauma, no event, but just plop there it goes.

fuck elon. fuck xai.

build the fuckin water treatment plant you promised in memphis.

From your lips to God's ears my friend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 30 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Isn’t all excessive wealth built on suffering?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago

Also billions in welfare from the US government.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

In 2020, Elon Musk was worth around $25 billion dollars.

Eat the rich.

[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Correction: All capitalist wealth is built on suffering

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hayvan@piefed.world 23 points 1 week ago

I was hoping he'd fail to get that valuation but you know what, it's fitting. Capitalism is bullshit, neoliberalism is a scam, a king of obvious, ridiculous frauds having the hugh score in the game is perfectly fitting.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Don't forget a Nazi also.

[–] meowcar42O@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I doubt the second and third trillionaires won't also be killers

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

Well I'm sure the second trillionaire will be nice and down-to-earth

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

Its insane the thing he did with the stock offering where he gets stock every time they produce stock. He has made so many bad decisions he should be a story about a rich guy who lost it all but because we have eliminated tax on the rich its now almost impossible to lose money.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every empire of wealth is built on the suffering of others. The only one I can think of that isn't is Dolly Parton's.

[–] kuerbiskernoel@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Steam? My local music instrument producer? High class restaurants? There are some but not many.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

America is built on suffering. We are all pieces of shit and murders.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Is that the guy who at Christmas day begged Epstein to let him in his island?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

His companies have been valued at $X billion/million each. That doesn't mean he (or any of the "richest people") actually has that much wealth. It means that he has gamed the system of company valuation. He needs that for his fragile ego.

Of course they're all still wayyyyy too rich, but -

Fuck that "trillionaire" shit. Every time this is mentioned, Musk's ego is stroked. And I feel dirty just writing that last sentence. Eww.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No and yes. Actual wealth is stupid complicated and difficult to see, but when you have stocks priced that high, you can trade shares or take bank loans against them. So in some sense, it's partially real money.

That Schrodinger's wealth is super useful for gaming the tax system, and since it's not in cash or gold or whatever, you can't really guillotine the owners and distribute it because without the backing of banking and stock market, those stocks are indeed worthless.

As you can see, the neoliberal "free market x combines worst parts of every system and serves only evil, corrupt ones. There can never anything good come out of such an economic system.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can take loans against the "worth" of your company, which has been overvalued in a corrupt way. It can grow into a pyramid scheme; Musk certainly did this.

[–] cybervegan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Not only can you take loans against your shares, but you can pay the interest on those loans with dividends from the shares, and because they're a loans, the cash-in-hand is not taxable, so you pay NO TAX on it. You have no "income" on paper, but you can pay people and companies with shares instead of money, shares that you can literally conjure into existence by typing numbers into a spreadsheet. Those money and shares are really useful for greasing the palms of politicians, government officials, and hangers-on so that you can get your way. You can even use this money and influence to cause riots and stoke division in society.

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His net worth is inflated even by American standards where net worth is already insanely inflated.

A lot of times, company evaluation is calculated by being roughly 10x it's yearly revenue. Alphabet, meta, all fit this. Space X is literally valued close to 100x

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

company evaluation is calculated

I listened to a podcast about this and according to that it's more insidious; valuation companies are owned by the people who own the business to be valued, and similar types of corruption.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If I had a dollar for every dollar Elon Musk made earnestly, I'd have like twenty bucks. He's a figurehead that is being used to hold that much money and act all childish because the alt-right pipeline starts in middle school and unsocialized boys look up to him and thus branch into STEM. The FBI does a similar thing with influencers they use as the centerpiece to cults of personality to create means in which to keep an eye on and investigate certain archetypes in the culture, as well as provide propaganda to.

[–] minty@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago

Demonic levels of wealth

[–] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

we are already counting over an estimated million deaths (mostly children) as a direct result for him making those super duper funding cuts for basically any basic needs for the poorest and most in need, all to mildly chip away at the cost of the super duper tax cuts the world's richest were getting at the same time.

not just a "killer," he's the world's richest person and he directly decided that mountains of children should die.

how do you define a cartoon villain?

he is so evil that he looks like a parody of evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Asshole of the world.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

benefited from his equally abhorrent dad, who owned at least part of an emerald mine that gave him his starting fortune.

load more comments
view more: next ›