this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
195 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21567 readers
1090 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 53 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The White Australia party

WAP. Really, that's what you went with? lol

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago

Wireless Access Protocol, slow, extremely expensive and just not worth it.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago

A bunch of pussies you say?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] BehindetheClouds@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago

I think most people do that with WAP

If you hide your members your numbers cannot be legit, also Australians really could use a list of people to punch freely.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

A neo-Nazi group has been told it cannot become a political party if it continues to redact the names of its potential members, as it launches a legal challenge to being designated as a banned hate group.

The White Australia party, also known as the National Socialist Network, and its national president Thomas Sewell launched a constitutional challenge in the high court of Australia on Friday against the ban by the federal government.

In a cover letter sent to the Australia Electoral Commission (AEC) on 25 April as part of its application to form a political party, the group said it intentionally provided a redacted list of 1,779 members to protect members’ identification.

The group said it plans to submit its membership details – and progress its application – pending a decision by the high court, with a spokesperson saying it did not want to “doxx” its members. The group has requested a court order to prevent the commonwealth from taking any action against the group while the constitutional challenge is under way.