this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
333 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84512 readers
5559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Thank god for this perceptive watchdog, or we may have never known!

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

That's Capitalism, working! The peasantry don't need water or electricity. They can use candles and go to the creek.

-- Every CEO, probably

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

TL;DR: American power grid sucks and allows connecting extreme variable loads without any mitigation measures.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 4 points 11 hours ago

Charlie! You can never come back!

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All for some shit none of us asked for

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

Shit that's actively ruining the world, actually.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep, soon enough we'll all be just as fucked as Texans during a cold snap.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 10 points 15 hours ago

Idea: put the data centers in Texas. They have their own grid separate from the other two. It'll be fun.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What's the difference between Texas and taxes?

Taxes keep you warm in the winter

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

But we pay for utilities separate from our taxes.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly my point. We (royal we, referring to a large proportion of US inhabitants) pay a privately owned corporation for services essential to living. They are allowed to extract profit via rate hikes and service cuts and are additionally allowed to develop monopolies. Dead people are a sacrifice private industry is willing to make in pursuit of profit (see: American death ensurance).

The "separate but equal" Texan electrical grid is a textbook example of why utilities management should remain under the purview of a publicly-accountable governing body. My quip is dark because people died. Its also true. Its meant to quietly challenge the concept that a government levying taxes is tyrannical.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

utilities management should remain under the purview of a publicly-accountable governing body

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Utility_Commission_of_Texas

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did you even care to read that article?

What do you think "investor-owned electric utilities" means? My WHOLE FUCKING POINT is that "competition" and "investor-owned" in the context of public utilities and services kills people.

Here, have a Wikipedia article;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture

[–] btsax@reddthat.com -1 points 4 hours ago

Maybe Texans should elect someone who won't appoint stooges to the PUC

[–] DenimFootpath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

Tax dollars are/should be used to fund and improve the grid

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What did we expect? We focused on military, not infrastructure. Our government believes solar, wind, and hydro is useless and clean coal is the only source

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not all of north america.

Canada is a world leader in nuclear and number 3 for hydro for example.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Being a world leader in nuclear power just means you have more than three power plants and you haven't been bombed by israel or the US for it.

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And developed a reactor that doesnt need enriched uranium, removing the risk of weapons development.

And have been one of the few countries to deploy reactors under budget and on time.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You mean thorium reactors, invented in the US in the 1950s? Or recycle reactors, also invented by the US in the 1950s?

Also that second part also describes the actual world leader in nuclear power which has more than 100x the reactors of Canada and no nuclear disasters on record...

[–] klankin@piefed.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Like the "hasnt left the lab in 75 years" thorium reactors (Which current designs still need enriched uranium)? and the recycle reactors that produce weapons grade plutonium (Of course, also via enriched uranium)? Id love to see you

No I dont mean those, I mean the CANDU's, a viable system that has been operating for around the same amount of time thorium has been in development hell (again, 75 years).

Are you trying to say america has never had a nuclear disaster on record? Cause its pretty easy to google that US has had more nuclear accidents in the 2000's than canada has in the past century. The Three Mile Island meltdown was probably the worst nuclear accident in north america, its hardly reasonable to ignore it. Unless you count uranium mining accidents, cause then the Church Rock uranium mill takes the crown.

And which country has ~2000 nuclear reactors? I must have missed this in my research, with those numbers they account for approximately 4x the total number of reactors in the world, a surprising oversight. (Or are you doing some football math that 94/19 = 100x? Cause even if 94/19=5x then per capita america is still lacking)

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago

China, was the magic answer, at 62 current reactors and another 50 expected to come online by 2030. Without a single nuclear disaster.

To the rest of your nonsense, CANDUs still require enriched uranium. As in, if the 'natural uranium' (the "organic" label of the nuclear world) does not have enough 238, it can't work.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Naw duh. You could probably replace 50 data centers with 12 jumping spider brains, those are some really intelligent critters..

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Accidental spider release plagues nearby town. 'Nobody wants to fall asleep anymore', says citizen."

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 22 hours ago

That's why you only use the brains of the spiders, not the whole spider!