this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
191 points (99.5% liked)

politics

29612 readers
105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House on Wednesday approved the renewal of the nation’s warrantless spy powers in a 235-191 vote that cleared the chamber with support from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. The bill, which would renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), still has to clear the Senate, another challenging hurdle before the powers expire on April 30. Section 702 of FISA allows the government to spy on foreigners located abroad, but it has long generated calls to include a warrant requirement before reviewing any information collected on Americans who communicate with overseas targets. The measure passed by the House on Wednesday includes modest reforms to the program, including allowing a larger pool of lawmakers to review information presented to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. It extends Section 702 for three years — longer than the 18-month request initially made by President Trump. But those changes were not enough to win over privacy hawks on both sides of the aisle, a dynamic likely to replay itself in the Senate. This year also saw a greater number of Democrats who opposed renewing Section 702, with many arguing the Trump administration could not be trusted not to abuse the powerful spy tool. While 147 Democrats voted to renew Section 702 in 2024, this year just 42 did. And while 88 Republicans opposed FISA when it was last considered, this time just 22 did – a sign of Trump’s influence on the issue.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Love that these stories provide vote counts but no method to check how your representative voted.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not this one. The vote total doesn't match.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Weird. Searching the site, there's only a handful of votes registered today. One of them does match the vote total, but it's entirely unrelated:

Bill Title & Description: Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act

Vote Type: Yea-And-Nay

Status: Passed

Votes yea: 235

nay: 191

Eta: Yeah, this site shows a picture of the vote totals, labeled "S 1318"

But checking the House website, "S 1318" was the one referenced above, not the FISA vote.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ugh. That's it. Here's the text. They erased a bill to fix the graves of American-Jewish servicemembers to pass FISA.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1318) entitled “An Act to direct the American Battle Monuments Commission to establish a program to identify American-Jewish servicemembers buried in United States military cemeteries overseas under markers that incorrectly represent their religion and heritage, and for other purposes.”, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. Short titles; table of contents. (a) Short titles.—This Act may be cited as the “Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act” and the “Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act”.

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2026142?Page=2&Date=04%2F29%2F2026

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

I hadn't actually clicked into it to read the text. I wouldn't think I would have to.

What. The actual. Fuck.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

i don’t think you really do tho.

“I’m convinced that this has been fixed,” House Rules Committee Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), who voted against FISA renewal in 2024, said Tuesday.

Oh it's "fixed" all right. If the entire GOP is suddenly like "oh this is fine now that Trump's in charge" it definitely means "the fix is in."

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Section 702 of FISA allows the government to spy on foreigners located abroad

And they try to gaslight the world to just trust their closed source products and or centralized services with security and privacy.