this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
347 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

58957 readers
111 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Also please tell me if a meme is even allowed as the thumbnail for the post in this community - just feels like it gets some of my current desperation across :D

Since the last time I posted here sharing my new home server, I've gotten a little more acquainted with the services I'm using. After getting acquisition of shows and movies sorted, I ventured into music (streaming).

As many here, I'm used to using streaming services for music, ie. Spotify or YouTube Music. Naturally, I tried a similar approach by setting up my Arr stack to feed its music into Jellyfin where the music is picked up by Symfonium. I tried it out for a couple days and liked it quite a bit since it keeps my phone clean of "unnecessary" data but I still retain access to music. Unfortunately, the way I acquire my music limits my selection quite a bit unless I venture into torrenting, which I'd prefer not to. So unless I figure out a safe way to torrent on my server, I'm stuck with getting access to a very limited selection of artists and albums.

In addition to that limitation, there's also the files formats of the music. Most of the music I've downloaded was only available in FLAC, which is awesome if you've got the bandwidth and data plan for playback, but for me it means that I spend 3GB of data for a day of streaming music which is just not sustainable.

In comparison, I can set up a Revanced version of Spotify in addition to my Revanced YT Music to get access to all the music I could want. Unfortunately, that comes with the caveat of still being tied to the companies I'm trying to get rid of - albeit not financially anymore, but I'm still sharing my data.

Ultimately, I'm not sure what to do. What I love about self-hosting is the independence from all the companies we're being fucked over by in all kinds of imaginable ways. But if it's free, outside my sharing data with them, can I really compete?

I'd be interested in hearing your opinions and thoughts on this. How did you solve music streaming with your build?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Personally, I just have the local files saved on my devices and listen to them locally. No usage of the network, no need to set up Navidrome or anything like that, it works really well! I don't really change the music I listen to that much, but if I did need to sync between devices, I could simply use Syncthing!

One slight gripe is that, when listening to music on my phone, I get notification pings interrupting my music. When I get the time, I want to get a dedicated MP3 player to avoid this issue, probably some iPod or a clone that supports Rockbox.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 112 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Leeching off corporations' infrastructures for free is a noble endeavor and everyone should do it.

[–] morto@piefed.social 63 points 1 week ago

Network traffic, unique accesses, etc are metrics used by investors and media to measure their success, so we're still contributing to it, and also, we're preventing alternatives from gaining more fame, so getting rid of corporations should always be the preferred path

[–] verrymay@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

spotify and google will figure out a way to block modded apps eventually.

nobody can take your home server and its content away from you

[–] Sisyphe@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bum music off of Spotify and save up for a home server in the meantime, got it.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Today servers can be nothing more than a $50 nuc from eBay with a larger drive in it, or an external one.

My server today is an old Small Form Factor Dell. It has no problem running VMWare ESXi, with multiple Windows and Linux VMs, ripping DVDs, converting videos and streaming, all at the same time.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The issue now is storage is getting pretty damn expensive

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In a dystopic future, somewhere...

Chilling out listening to some music
BANG!
"Put your hands up! No sudden moves!"
"But, but..."
"We tracked down self-hosting activities, and we're confiscating everything and taking you to jail"

[–] enkille@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i also only download flac files, and i keep them in my ~/music/lossless directory. i use picard to organize that, and wrote a bash script to keep a synchronized opus format copy in ~/music/lossy. on my phone i use termux/ssh to rsync the lossy files to my phone and avoid streaming altogether. for reference, my lossless directory is 221gb, and lossy is 19gb.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you use something like Navidrome to host your own streaming service you can set up automatic transcoding and enable it on your phones streaming client (I use Symfonium). This way I can always access my whole library at any point with it not using too much of my mobile data. But my flac collection is quite big and even if transcoded completely I could not fit all of it on my phones internal storage.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Same almost. I have an ~800gb main library of mostly lossless files that I squash to around 150gb by transcoding to 196k or something opus that i put locally on my phone. I also strip embedded cover art which can save a stupid amount of space sometimes; relying on folder hierarchy with cover.jpg/png files. (Bitrate is pretty overkill for me so I may drop it to 128-160...)

I haven't had the time to manage the tags properly on my reference library*, but my folder hierarchy encodes artist/album/title with optional years and track numbers. I wrote a linter script to check the structure, that every folder has a cover art image, and to warn about lossy formats not in directories suffixed with [lossy] (purely for documentation purposes; not used in script logic).

My transcode script generates tags from the folder and filenames, only copying genre tags if they exist and stripping everything else. Lossless files are transcoded while structure, art, and lossy files are copied. Then that result is synced to my mobile devices. So whenever I add music my workflow is to just name file folders properly and download or extract art then I just lint, transcode, and then resync.

*(Tags of my reference library don't matter so much to me, but the squashed lib needs consistent tags for mobile apps for behave as I intend)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Soulseek has far more music on it than you can typically find on free public torrent sites.

Just a heads up.

[–] duckshuffgoose@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

i started with lidarr and very, very quickly stripped that our for just slskd

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

why not both?

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't use revanced. The backbone of the dev team moved to morphs now, and so do other modders that used to dev using revanced.

https://morphe.software/

There was a bunch of drama that's worthy for Lemmy but stuck in reddit that I don't care to bring here.

It got easier to patch things in some ways, but having known how to do it "the complex way" with vanced and revanced before I feel like some is lost in translation.

But overall it's a lot better with morphe, the patches against megacorps efforts to block access comes quicker than revanced, and the YouTube minimum app requirement now moved up

load more comments (3 replies)

Bought a home server, threw at it an HDD and installed jellyfin. Now I buy my music from bandcamp or rip my own cds (yup, I'm buying cd's back too) and haven't logged to spotify ever since.

Can't be happier.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wrote an application which runs on my server and monitors my favorites on Tidal/Deezer/Qobuz. It downloads them in bulk whenever I have a premium account with one of them. Usually I purchase a month of premium every few months, at which point I get nice clean FLACs for local use.

The FLACs are moved to Jellyfin and I stream them using Finamp, which also supports transcoding, so I keep 128 kbps Opus files for offline playback and stream the raw FLAC files when bandwidth is no concern.

I have amassed a huge music library over the last decades, so even if all streaming websites go under tomorrow, I have enough music locally to last me a lifetime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Mp3 collections never stopped being cool, you just have to invest some time into it

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only problem with something like Revanced is that it can go away at literally any time. It could be shut down tomorrow and you'd lose access to everything it provides. That's fine, or at least tolerable, if you ALSO have something self-hosted you can rely on in case that happens. If you don't have downloaded music self-hosted, then you're totally relying on Revanced permanently and you lose everything if it goes away. Maybe for something like music that's an acceptable risk, but you have to consider it and decide where it is an acceptable risk. What are you going to do if those services you're relying on go away?

Self-hosting, like you said, is about the independence, and the knowledge that once it's up and running on your own hardware, it won't just go away on its own, and it can't just get "shut down" unless you choose to. You might not need that for every service you rely on, but there are probably at least some you would struggle without, and those are things you should consider self-hosting. The more you think about it, and the more comfortable you get with it, the more likely you'll decide other things are important enough to self-host after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Por qué no los dos?

[–] fozid@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ive been trying to get rid of YouTube for over a year now, but haven't found a solution im happy with so still sticking with revanced YouTube.

Got rid of Spotify 2 years ago and self host navidrome and it's perfect for me. I use dsub2000 on my android and feishin on my Linux desktop pc.

I'm UK based, so fairly strict internet laws and I torrent to supplement my owned media. I don't use flac, I'm sure if I tried I could hear the difference from 192kbit MP3, but honestly I don't care. 192kbit or similar mp3's are more than good enough for me.

Self hosting costs money. Hardware setup initially is expensive, both in money and time and effort. It's only a solution if you believe there is a problem that needs fixing.

For me it's well worth it for music. Video not so much, not yet anyway. I listen to the same songs 100s of times, but videos only once or maybe twice at most.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Use the left to find content, use the right to consume the content.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I do both.

The music I like is in my collection. I pay for it where I can, but I'll be honest some of it is pirated because I just can't buy it anywhere.

I also use Opentune to listen to YouTube music without logging in to stream stuff like "lofi chillhop beats".

I recently saw around here a music discovery service (self-hosted) I might try. Can't remember the name...

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

You're in the selfhosted community, surely you know what sort of answer you're going to get. If you just need to hear it, selfhost!

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Honestly? I just used PipePipe to download the songs I wanted as MP3 and saved em to USB. This a step above basic caveman shit lol. I suppose I could have gone real 2003, gone to the library, borrowed some CDs and ripped em manually.

In any case, as with all self hosting decisions, there has to come a point where you consider quality over quantity.

Great, you have 10,000 songs. How many of those do you actually listen to? 30? 100? 300? How much is enough? Because if the answer is 10,000...what do you have to give up to get that? Clearly, if you're uncomfortable with online music hosting, at some point, you need to bail. But how can you keep things fresh?

I have a crazy idea one day that I will use my self hosted LLMs (namely self hosted ACE-Step 1.5) to create my own filler play list, mixed with actual songs I enjoy (say, 350ish, meaningful tracks). The rough idea -

  • point LLM at MP3 folder
  • it randomly selects a song to play
  • creates AI based DJ that introduces those tracks as part of "station identity"
  • Additionally, have the AI based DJ read "local news" (based on my RSS feeds) every songs.
  • All of this blended into the generated station flow

I can see this whole thing being tunable too (mostly AI filler stuff, akin to LoFi girl, balanced mix, mostly my library and AI DJ etc).

I'm doing other LLM based shit right now, but I can 100% see myself doing this out of pure "Fuck it, why not".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can always transcode flac to another format to save bandwidth. I haven't used jellyfin for music, but shouldn't it support transcoding that too on the fly?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Either way, just remember to support artists when you can. Bandcamp Friday is one of the best ways I know of to fund artists in exchange for FLACs that you can legally listen to however you want to.

But I was a broke student in the heydays of torrenting, so I'm not judging using any means necessary to listen to music.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I use Tidal and Bandcamp

I'm hearing great things about Quobuz

Bandcamp and Quobuz allow you to buy and download music

And I have to mention, as I do in any thread like this: If you self-host music you bought you're a friend to me. If you pirate from billionaires, I don't care. If you pirate from small bands, stop it.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Revanced to discover new music, then selfhost what you liked.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

I listen to a LOT of music - basically most of the day when I'm not on a call.

I don't follow the mainstream so never had a spotify account, and am really listening either to radio-browser.info or a few channels on youtube that I sponsor, which link to the artists on bandcamp, where I buy the music I like.

To your point on bandwidth, I try to store music at the highest quality I can get, but then transcode to players.

I did try mp3fs to live transcode files to my phone in the past, but didn't use it much in the end.

I've torrented some music in the past, but TBH, I find it in different places easier nowadays.

I used to find some interesting stuff with Napalm FTP indexer - but be very careful with direct connections to random FTP servers.

Both. Use YT & Spotify as discovery engines (along with Pandora, Jango, and Soma FM), but download your favorite tracks and self-host.

I tend not to sail the Sea's very often. I generally prefer to buy the albums or borrow them from my friends or the local library, rip them to Flac and then stream them to my phone using either Jellyfin or Navidrome. When I just want a radio station, I'll open up Spotify. Many years ago, I had a collection of online radio stations I'd listen to, but over time they either closed their public streams and required an dedicated app or died off completely.

On your data bandwidth issue, both Jellyfin and Navidrome support on demand transcoding and can stream any bitrate you might want. There are options for it both in the web app and in most of the phone clients I've run across. I generally have my phone apps set to 96k MP3 as I can't really hear a difference most of the time, at least not with the headphones I have in combo with the background noise that is generally around me and my preexisting hearing damage. Most folks can't tell a difference between CD's and a 128k mp3.

As for torrenting, I can say that you will probably want a paid VPN running AND active any time your torrent software is running. Beyond that I would recommend you check out !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com for more information.

@v4ld1z I download my music onto each device, personally, but I do have some experience with streaming. I prefer it just to be rid of the companies, but I do also cut the quality of all of my music down from FLAC to 128kbps MP3s. I can't hear the difference, even on high end equipment, so it's just a gain for me. YMMV on that though.

I just use nextcloud to sync it all, though, and Symfonium on mobile/strawberry on desktop. It's about 10 gigs for all of my music. I don't have the largest collection, but 1.3k songs is still quite a bit

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I don't use most of the software you mention, but converting FLAC to other formats is pretty easy. E.g. with ffmpeg you'd say

ffmpeg -i somesong.flac -o somesong.mp3

or similarly for other formats. There are more options to control the output bit rates and that sort of thing.

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Self host, takes less time then you think after the initial library build. Easy to do in a weekend. If you have some money to spend on music then buy music from the artists you love. Can all be in one place, none of this exclusive garbage, quality as high as you want, can rip music that’s never been released digitally, and I think most importantly - access to your music library without an algorithm telling you what to listen to. You’ll be surprised how your listening habits change and how well you know your music after jumping off the engagement treadmill.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

i selfhost the music collection i own on LPs, to replace spotify/yt music i use Archivetune

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

A as a step towards B man

load more comments
view more: next ›