this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
72 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

43241 readers
160 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

*counts world population*

[ ! ]

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

It's so good that some people download two in case the first one breaks.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I got a superbly functional and super fast search / research / assistant tool from Qwen 3.6 35B and Open Web UI + SearXNG. All running local. It passed the WAF benchmark with flying colors.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

It's honestly incredible how good the local stack is nowadays. It's literally better than any frontier model you could've rented like a year ago.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I have a 16gb MacBook Air m4.

I like the idea of having a model I can run locally in the event of a possible long term internet outage.

Can you recommend a model that would be suitable for my computer?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

16gb is a bit low unfortunately. You could run a 2 bit quant of latest Qwen, but that's going to be a severely degraded performance. https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF

Might be worth trying though to see if it does what you need.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! I figured it’s low on ram, but with the way things are going in the world, maybe it’s better than nothing is what I’m thinking.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's entirely possible we might see fairly capable models that can be run with 16 gigs of RAM in the near future. Qwen 3.5 came out in February, and you needed a server with hundreds of gigs of memory to run a 397bln param model. Fast forward to a couple of weeks ago and 3.6 comes out with a 27bln param version beating the old 397bln param one in every way. Just stop and think about how phenomenal that is https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6-27b

So, it's entirely possible people will find ways to optimize this stuff even further this year or the next, and we'll get an even smaller model that's more capable.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks! That’s really amazing to hear. I guess I’ll wait a bit and see what happens.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Still worth using Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B? Runs about slightly faster than 3.6 27B on my hw.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I haven't tried comparing them myself, I guess you just kind of have to gauge if it works well enough. :)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What software are u using with the models for code? OpenCode, Nanocoder, etc.?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I ended up settling on opencode, but I find all of them work more or less the same nowadays. Pi is an interesting one which is very minimalist.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Integration with an editor?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've stopped bothering using an editor with LLMs. I just get the model to make a phased plan, write using TDD, and tell it to do staged commits for each feature. Then I just review the diffs after.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. And for web search u use the built-in or hook it up to SearXNG?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've just been using the builtin, but searxng might be better. Seems like a lot of people prefer it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. The built-in uses Brave I think.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think so yeah, searxng is definitely the most privacy focused option.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What model do you use and on what hw? I recently got a R9700 to experiment with the various Qwen 3.5/3.6 models.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm using 3.6 at 27bln and q8 on a M1 with 64gb.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What tps do you get on that?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Roghlt 10 to 13 tps give or take.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

long term internet outage is not that likely. But getting priced out of any online models is quickly the reality.

[–] Robin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

gemma-4-E4B-it

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why does Ollama only have a cloud version?

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Because how else will they take care of vendor lock-in without such requirement?

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago

The land of the CCP is the last place I'd expect to see FOSS AI agents. Good for them! Beats the hell out of our greedy bastards in the United States.