this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
95 points (97.0% liked)

politics

29335 readers
2605 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Clearly the man has priorities.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

You do realize that when a Triumph was declared, there was always a guy riding shotgun reminding the person that he was, in fact, only a mortal, yes?

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

American taxpayers will help fund the project, according to a publicly available spending plan for the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) released by the White House.

As per the spending plan, the NEH will dedicate $2m (£1.5m) in special funds and $13m in matching funds to the project.

The American taxpayer will "help" fund the project? Where are the other funds coming from? Seems like the NEH, a federal agency funded by... the taxpayer?

Or is this going to be Ballroom 2.0, another billionaire bribe monument to oligarchy?

[–] obre@slrpnk.net 24 points 10 hours ago
[–] FortyTwo@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

The American government and their supporters hate modern day Europe, and yet they're so obsessed with gaudy replication of old European stuff. You see it also with all the kitchy Roman-like pillars and replicas of the statue of David randomly plonked in some room. It's just so... weird. I guess they like the idea of "old" Europe, the good old days when they still spent half their time killing each other, and the other half killing people in far-away places. They probably see it as their own origin story, so they resent that the modern versions of these countries, after all the devastating wars, have evolved into modern, peaceful countries. Maybe they see themselves as defenders against modern debauchery like freedom, peace and happiness?

From my perspective it just seems kind of hollow and desperate, can't think of your own stuff to do so you decide to copy the megalomania of dysfunctional old empires that got crushed by their own ego and inability to peacefully coexist in prosperity. There's a reason they're not around anymore, and copying them, aside from being vaguely pitiful, just means you're headed to the same end. Let's hope it won't take two world wars for America to catch on.

[–] G3NI5Y5@europe.pub 7 points 8 hours ago

Exclusive footage of Trump and his architect planing the new Triumphal Arch.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 hours ago

I was 100% sure this is an onion article

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What a tonedeaf ass Trump is

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

I just saw him sputtering something about how CNN had a 100% approval poll or something. No idea just WTAF he was even talking about. I think the few neurons he has are shorting out.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 9 hours ago

No, you fat fucking pig.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 11 hours ago

Good to see the things this admin doesn't consider "waste fraud and abuse"

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 34 points 15 hours ago
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 45 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing says "working towards the need of the working stiffs" like grandiose pointless architecture.

Fun fact: all dictators like architectural megaprojects. This is what Hitler had in mind for Berlin for instance. Or this monstrosity built by Ceaucescu. The Arc de Epstein and the Epstein ballroom should tell you something about Trump.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

At least those were useful buildings.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Damn. That is gaudy as all fuck.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A pointless gilded arch!? People are trying to survive in Trump's disastrous economy. I have a hard time imagining anything he could do that would be more out-of-touch...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

He'll want to call it the Trump Arch, but let's just call it the "Let Them Eat Cake" Arch.

The best thing about it is that he'll hate it, but he won't know why. I GUARANTEE that he's never heard of Marie Antoinette, and doesn't know what Let Them Eat Cake means, and that just makes it better.

Wait until he hears about the French Revolution.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

I’m not convinced that Americans have the same appetite for revolution as the French….

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I can't wait to spray paint "Trump Rapes Kids" on this piece of shit.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 7 points 13 hours ago

Better delete this comment first! I ain't see nothing...

[–] slippyferret@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 17 hours ago

More like “one nation under gold”.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Finally, a place to hang all the trump traitors in public. Or should we borrow a guillotine from France?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

No, hang them from the Let Them Eat Cake Arch, then destroy it, and weigh down their bodies with the rubble, and drop them in the ocean.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Trump would build the Tower of Babel in his name if he could.

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 10 points 17 hours ago

Would anyone understand it? (Couldn't resist)

[–] karashta@piefed.social 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You only get a Triumph if you conquered enough enemies and gathered enough wealth to appease the senators of Rome.

This arch is a sham! Triumphal, my ass.

Suck some more Bill Clinton dick, President Donald "the rapist pedophile" Trump.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Or if you are Prussian or Napoleon, but I don't anyone is questioning the Brandenburg Gate or the Arche de Triumph. Also I feel like Bolivar built one but I can't source that right now, just kinda a vibe about him in particular.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago