this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1785 readers
11 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neoliberalism is rarely named by conservative politicians, let alone something they bicker about in public. It is, however, the doctrine the Coalition – and the Liberal Party in particular – has long championed.

It was embraced enthusiastically under John Howard’s government from the late 1990s, through market liberalisation, industrial relations reform, privatisation of state enterprises, financial deregulation and significant reductions in corporate taxation.

Neoliberalism is also the word traditionally used by the Left to criticise this policy agenda, particularly the inequality it fuelled by shifting power, income, and security away from labour and towards capital.

On the face of it, Hastie’s language overlaps with elements of that critique, for example when he says that “a lot of Australians feel like the system is rigged against them” and that “we’re experiencing a lot of economic pain” as the global order fractures.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago

The challenge for corporate Australia is no longer how to protect markets from politics, but how to act credibly in the national interest, recognising that economic power carries civic responsibility and that long‑term legitimacy depends on more than growth alone.

I'm sure that will be quite the challenge for them. :|

This article seems pretty optimistic to my cynical arse, but the author is undoubtedly more qualified than I am to make such statements. I guess we'll see what happens.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago

I wonder whether Hastie's message is also a way of trying to attract back ex-LNP voters who went to the Teals.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 0 points 5 days ago

Padme Amidala: “For social democracy, right …?”

[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is surely not going to please the liberal party's masters / corporate donors.

Would be a quite surprised if the party did a 180 turn and started putting the majority of voters ahead of their corporate donors interests.

[–] Superdooper@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I can imagine the Libs messaging doing a 180 but they would never deliver what they promise if they are elected.