No, she was and is complicit.
this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
75 points (93.1% liked)
news
846 readers
914 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
Okay, so didn't ask. But thanks anyways for bringing up the Epstein files now that Iran is taking a back seat.
She would only have made this statement if she's been getting questions about it.
But I am glad that she's bringing people's attention back to the Trump-Epstein files.
Remember, people, they are trying to make you focus on the Epstein files just so you forget about the war in Iran!
Covering up the cover-up with the cover-up! This really is 2D chess.
Yo dawg. We heard you like cover-ups, so we covered up your cover-up with a cover-up covering a cover-up.
1D snakes and ladders.
She's still married to her trafficker what does she mean by this?
I doubt she was, but that does not mean she was not an Epstein asset
No one ever thought she was.
Why is she in the feed again? Just because?
I mean, this “don’t mention that i was friends with Epstein” press tour, apparently - why?
They cover this shit in undergraduate psych. I mean, come on…
Hahaha
D e n i a l
Well yeah, there'd be a poorly-spelled e-mail like 'hey don thax for lteting me fuck ur new bich.'
Apparently the world's greatest encryption is being rich.