I don't understand why you're being asked for an opinion on fucking war crimes, gina. Unless you have an expertise in that area you'd care to disclose

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Here's that portrait she likes:

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago

I personally think this portrait is rather flattering. Particularly in the context of Vincent's other works. I think she's far uglier in person.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago

Make sure to check them all out!

Art is great.

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 days ago

The only thing more ridiculous than Gina's opinions is that stupid posh accent she puts on.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago

Because the law is the same for everyone, Gina.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Her pollution has killed way more people. Ben's murders don't come close. She wouldn't get it.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure her old man has some dodgy history with mining leases and indigenous groups while we're complaining about the Reinharts.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

They didn't earn their billions by not committing genocide, that's for damn sure.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I find these reaction articles a bit odd and sometimes wonder whether they're at all helpful. None of these people are at all relevant in this context, they're just being quoted because they have power and influence and therefore generate views when they make controversial public statements. Like if Gina was sponsoring his defence or something then that would be worth writing about, but otherwise I don't give a fuck what she thinks and I don't see why anyone else would either.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can bet your ass this parasite is trying to bring fascism into the Aussie mainstream. That's why she's saying this, and why it's being reported.

If you read between the lines Hanson also said this recently, so they're essentially right wing media mouth pieces coordinating propaganda. I bet Sky News and all of Murdochs other psyops are heavily promoting opposition to prosecuting war criminals. That's what fascists do.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 0 points 3 days ago

She's a huge Trump fan.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She doesn't seem to understand a lot of things, such as art.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I knew her name sounded familiar.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why does this grease sacks opinion get to be headlines? Her wealth? Also, pretty disappointed the guardians has followed the pattern of constantly affixing “most decorated soldier” to every mention of him. Worthy commendations sure, but he’s either guilty of his charges or not.

Very poor form the guardian shading these charges with titles of the accused and the whinings of costs by a wealth hoarder.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago

Why does this grease sacks opinion get to be headlines? Her wealth?

Correct.

[–] porcelainpitcher@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago

And shit like this is exactly why I have been referring to them as The Giardian for a couple years now. Shitty, nauseating rubbish.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because under capitalist "democracy", your level of both speech and political representation is proportional to your wealth.

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 days ago

In capitalist democracy, wealth proportions you!