this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
365 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29343 readers
1923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A group of 36 lawmakers says the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has created “disappearances” on US soil, due to the “increasingly unreliable” online system used to track people detained by immigration authorities, according to a letter shared with the Guardian.

The lawmakers, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, are urging that the DHS inspector general’s office open an investigation into the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) “online detainee locator system” (ODLS), which has been used for years by family members, attorneys and journalists to track people in the federal immigration detention system.

“Since January 2025, that system has grown increasingly unreliable,” the lawmakers, including Senator Ben Ray Luján and House representatives Veronica Escobar and Lauren Underwood, say in the letter. “Without a functional locator system, DHS is effectively creating ‘disappearances’ on US soil, and we urge the DHS office of inspector general (OIG) to investigate this matter.”

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Another strongly worded letter.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No, this is Elizabeth Warren, not Schmuck Schumer. Now that she's on the case, she'll be demanding answers, and it will hit the media, just like this did.

She should take Schmuck's place as Senate majority leader after the Dems take the Senate in the midterms, then AOC can complete his humiliation by taking his seat in the Senate.

Fuck that loser.

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

I thought it was called kidnapping.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 19 points 4 days ago

And if they DONT stop they'll get even MORE Funding!

-Also Democrats?

[–] Jayve@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Hold DHS accountable, cancel Qualified Immunity for extra- judicial actions. Allow criminal and civil actions against ICE agents.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Accuse? That's what is happening.

I hate this sanewashing Murc's Law bullshit.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

Late to the party. Weak. Pointless. Useless. But fuck me, do they try, really really hard to make themselves sound like they're doing something.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 9 points 4 days ago

make sure to do nothing about it

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The political math is the issue Republicans control the House (narrowly) and the Senate, so Democrats can’t force legislation, subpoenas, or funding cuts on their own.

That leaves only a few options

  • Letters demanding IG investigations (which this is)
  • Floor speeches and press conferences
  • Attempts to attach amendments to must-pass bills
  • Public pressure campaigns

The letter from Warren. is aimed at the DHS Office of Inspector General, which is technically independent and can investigate without congressional approval. But OIGs are often slow, under-resourced, and subject to political pressure from the administration.

Just trying to give prospective about the options available to them.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Nothing changes through purely peaceful protest. Labor Rights and Civil Rights were both won through bloodshed.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If I were a dem governor I would simply announce no prosecutions for violence against ice agents.

Sincerely yours,

Professor Dingus McDipshit

Pretty sure those would be federal. You could refuse to give the feds info tho.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I would vote for you