this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
91 points (94.2% liked)

news

929 readers
887 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If kids these days are anything like we were as kids being forced to do something will just result in that thing being mocked, derided, and never taken seriously... Outside of the already brainwashed kids, that is.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

easiest way to turn people away is to make em actually read that dumbshit themselves, there's a reason priests pick and choose a couple snippets every week...

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Indeed, I had the benfit of agnostic parents and no forced church time, but I remember reading the bible a bit around 11-12 years old and thinking it was insane people believe that shit is real.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, i went to a private Catholic school. Everyone of us laughed at the bible.

Like DARE. Everyone I know who owns a DARE shirt wears it ironically.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Where's my Satanic Temple forcing kids to instead read from science books?

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They've been quiet lately. Wondering what happened.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're not an activist organization. Americans United or the Freedom From Religion Foundation are the ones who will most likely be fighting this.

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

it's clear they (we all) lost

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

To be honest, my junior year English teacher forced us to read the bible "to have a stronger basis for understanding western literature" and it had zero impact on my lack of religious beliefs. Literally, we spent like 2 or 3 months on that crap. Looking back it was a pretty obvious scam by her, but it had zero impact in the direction that she wanted it to have impact.

[–] degen@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can get the cultural relevance, but between world history, the enlightenment, and American revolution, Christianity is basically covered in history class already. Not to mention the exposure from society at large.

Like maybe have a religious studies elective if you're really feeling it. Requirement is crazy though, and it's not like reading the bible is about to convert any kids as you experienced.

The more I think about it, I feel like meaningful study of anything biblical is past high school level to begin with.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I doubt it. States have tried over and over again (both recently and in the past) to require the Bible, to require the 10 commandments, and on and on to no ultimate success. The Establishment Clause is clear, and this is more political theater from a Republican dominated government trying to gin up support for the midterms by creating a spectacle.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

New SCOTUS, new repression

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

And yet none of the attempts in the last decade have stuck. Same SCOTUS.

This is just political theater.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's nothing in the constitution that prevents Bible Studies from being mandatory, it's existed in the past.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes and no: the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from overtly favoring one religion over another, so if they want Bible studies in public schools, they'll have to equitably provide Catholics, Satanists, Muslims, Witches, Polytheists, etc. the same deference and inclusion in teaching materials as Protestant Christianity.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I was told there's no better way to churn out atheists than to make them read from religious books. I hope it holds.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

"Poor character development, and the author is a little bit preachy."

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I was already required to read Bible passages in Texas public high school. Got my only C in a English class because apparently my interpretation of David wasn't up to snuff.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is discriminatory since Republicans can't read.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ezekiel 23:20