this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
77 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

13223 readers
570 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the16bitgamer@programming.dev 30 points 6 days ago

Good night sweet prince

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

looks like no distros support a 486 anyway

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Pretty sure out there is at least one distro like knoppix or minix that will still support even the oldest CPUs. But yeah, nothing mainstream.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My Packard Bell will be so sad

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Should have got the Pentium.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago

That’s sad. :(

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if that includes all 16 bit processors.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Linux (at least the mainline version) never supported 16-bit processors. Linus started writing the operating system on his brand new 32-bit 386 machine, and he never looked back.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought 486 was a 16 bit processor. My bad.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That would've been the 286. Practically ancient history

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

And no MMU, so basically impossible to implement real multi tasking.