this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Lawns

3945 readers
1 users here now

What is No Lawns?

A community devoted to alternatives to monoculture lawns, with an emphasis on native plants and conservation. Rain gardens, xeriscaping, strolling gardens, native plants, and much more! (from official Reddit r/NoLawns)

Have questions or don't know where to begin?

Where can you find the official No Lawns socials?

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill was introduced in Sep/25, but I only got a whiff of it in the last couple of weeks

See House Bill HB1878: https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/pa/2025-2026/bills/PAB00038963/

Are there any other states/countries taking similar initiatives?

Summary:

Pennsylvania homeowners deserve the right to choose native plant species they desire for landscaping around their homes. However, work is needed to remove bottlenecks for homeowners to select native vegetation for their desired landscaping.

This legislation will prevent homeowners associations (HOAs) from unreasonably prohibiting the use of native plants for landscaping on private property. This ensures homeowners residing within an HOA the same ability to choose native landscaping as other homeowners.

Native plants provide many beneficial functions that many homeowners desire. These include being aesthetically pleasing and providing habitat for pollinators while being adapted to the site and typically requiring lower maintenance than non-native plants. [...]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 0 points 4 weeks ago

Maryland has HB232 which supersedes all HoA law and says any low impact landscaping / xeriscaping is permissible AND favored if it prioritizes native plants and fauna / pollinators.

The simplest thing to come of it is “you can’t force me to grow grass”

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago

God forbid you have native plants that thrive for the entire local ecosystem it supports. This spreads out as the local habitats need to leave their native homes to find other sources for their foods. Plant native. It’s good for our planet!

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

OP, this was introduced September 25, 2025 (you mention this), sponsored by 14 of the Pennsylvania House's 203 members (all Democratic in a split House), and its only action so far after introduction was to be referred to the Housing & Community Development Committee (read: nothing).

It's not dead or anything, but it's made no progress whatsoever in seven months, and fhe next session starts January 2027. This bill categorically is not evidence that it's "becoming law across America".

[–] dumples@piefed.social 0 points 4 weeks ago

Thanks for the additional context

[–] notabot@piefed.social 0 points 4 weeks ago (14 children)

HOAs are such a fascinatingly American thing. They seem to cause no end of annoyance for those living in them, and have few to no positive effects (at least, we don't hear about any positives), yet they persist.

Can those who are adversely affected not do anything about their local ones, or is it actually a case that they're not too bad for most people most of the time?

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

There's very little people can do. In order to fix things you usually need to get on the board, but the people who run HOAs are usually retired nimby assholes and they hold meetings while most in the neighborhood are at work so nobody can oppose them. They then reelect themselves to the board and the cycle continues. HOAs are usually a thing set up by the builders to make their lives easier for some paperwork and stuff. They absolutely suck 99% of the time.

Native plant garden bans aren't just an HOA thing. Many counties or cities ban them too. Much of it stems for chemical manufacturers selling the white picket fence image after WWII to veterans receiving funding to buy a home. The chemical manufacturers pushed hard for that image so they could keep making as much profit as they made manufacturing for weapons during the wartime.

This means that trying to fight your HOA on yards is useless, you have to go higher and it's a big big fight

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats why you dont dight the HOA, you sabotage them with geurilla gardening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

You make a compelling case

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you like videos, you should definitely watch Climate Townś "America's Dumbest Crop" when you have the time:

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=KLYMjPNppRQ

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

HOAs are usually a thing set up by the builders to make their lives easier for some paperwork and stuff.

Builders are encouraged by the local government to set up HOAs because it lets said government shirk its responsibility to maintain infrastructure and services.

If your subdivision is gated, its streets are private and the homeowners are responsible for repaving them, for instance.

(Of course, that's only a motivation cities caught onto relatively recently. The original reason for HOAs -- at least for neighborhoods of single-family houses, as opposed to condos that have legitimate shared maintenance -- was to help keep black people out.)

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 0 points 4 weeks ago

Good input. I was definitely doing some "draw the rest of the owl" for brevity about their history and impact.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

HOAs offsets the cost and maintenance of roads and other civil services, so many counties love them because it keeps costs down for the government while charging the neighborhood. It keeps taxes down overall.

HOA benefit to have their own fiefdom, that allows them to weld near unchecked power because the turn out for board elections are even lower than most local elections.

Homeowners have the ability dissolve their HOA but they don't because people don't vote.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago

They’re fine to terrible depending on where you’re at. In our neighborhood they make sure no junky cars (cars on blocks) are left outside and that you don’t leave massive oil spills in your driveway and that your house is painted when it starts to peel. They also have planted a bunch of native gardens and maintain them and the dog bag dispensers and poop bins. Would just be better if the city did it, but whatever.

Pretty much nothing of what that other user said is true. HOAs host meetings at night usually, anyone can come, yes people don’t come and vote but that’s usually because people are fine with their HOA. They can’t vote themselves back in. If they sucked 99% of the time they wouldn’t exist, because getting rid of them is dead simple, literally show up and vote.

[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Or sooner move into a pile of feces than into a house with a HOA
You end up with what you put up with

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 0 points 4 weeks ago

You just can't handle all the freedom.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago

and like most things that are bad about the us, they exist because of racism

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Dismantling them would require somehow introducing a vote to abolish the hoa, and a lot of people involved in hoas are ancient NIMBYs that have nothing better to do after retirement that be in other people's business. The purpose of an HOA is to ostensibly preserve property values, and only homeowners are allowed to vote, not any poor suckers that are renting and actually living there.

[–] tenacious_mucus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

To add to some of the other replies (road repair, etc) the one we used to live in also offered access to a full pool area with life guards. This included a lap pool (with certain adult only times), toddler shallow pool, a medium (standing/walking) depth that had some fountains in it and a splash pad. A decent sized play ground. There was also a larger event space with a kitchen that you could rent (price was free, just had to schedule a slot and sign a damages waver). The fee also included “beautification” things like all the flower beds and landscaping/grass maintenance in all the public areas, which included a 2 mile loop running/walking path with the various body-weight workout stops. Tennis courts, community events with food/games/etc. It’s about $880 a year now i think, and the only rules were really just keep your place looking decent. We didnt have any issues because i always mowed the lawn and trimmed the bushes anyways…there’s also guidelines for not painting your house crazy colors or building really weird structures, but it was pretty easy for your average lifestyle all things considered.

I guess really like an apartment complex, but you have your own house you can do whatever you want to with- for better or worse. Im no advocate for HOAs, not even this one. I will never live in one again…but not all HOAs are equal is my only point. Some are $1000 year with literally nothing to “give back”. Eff all that.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 0 points 4 weeks ago

You hear about the shitty ones, tbh.

Mine covers the community pool, a few small playgrounds, gym, community garden, etc. Thats it.

No getting approval to have your door be blue instead of white, no measuring your grass height, or any of those shenanigans.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

They were made to harass minorities as far as I'm concerned.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

If you want to see the positives of HOAs, Google "What are the legal options for dealing with my neighbor Reddit."

Most people have a significant portion of their wealth tied into their property. Getting a new drug addicted neighbor three years before retirement could lead to unintended financial consequences. There are good HOAs, it's just that nobody complains about them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

have few to no positive effects

The purpose of an HOA (in theory) is to divide the costs of land maintenance across land owners.

In practice, HOAs are routinely abused for rent seeking and stigmatization of minorities. But that's not a problem specific to the legal arrangement. It's a consequence of the managers and members.

Check out the HBO show "Neighbors". A great look into the mind of a land owner.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

HOAs are criminally oppressive, born from the desire to prevent colored families from moving into white neighborhoods, and should be outlawed.

[–] dumples@piefed.social 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know if MN has this law but I did get a grant this year from the states Board of Water and Soil Resources to plant native as a lawn replacement. It's amazing. It's called Lawns to Legumes

https://bwsr.state.mn.us/l2l

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

MN passed a law in 2023 preventing cities from banning native lawns. It said notbong about HOAs, though. Even the state don't wanna fuck with them, it seems. Link

[–] dumples@piefed.social 0 points 4 weeks ago

Better than nothing

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 4 weeks ago

It's becoming law-n

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 0 points 4 weeks ago

Nature lowers property values, which is weird because I like nature.

This got me thinking about what my ideal city would look like, so I asked AI make an image based off my description, and honestly not bad:

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

But what about my property values? /s

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 weeks ago

If you're rich enough to have a lawn or grounds then you should be able to decide what you do with it.

As we understand the over-use of land and bungalow sprawl's ignored issues, this will become a non-problem with the slow migration to proper consolidated, shared space.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey who in US is leading a fight for mandatory 30 day minimal vacations a year and, nationalization of all seashores and guaranteed health care?
I want to join

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 0 points 4 weeks ago

Let's see...We've got the party that bombs foreigners for no reason, or... The other party that also bombs foreigners for no reason.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Kinda funny how Americans call their country "land of the free" but can't even do certain things on THEIR OWN PROPERTY because of the HOAs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Should we go down the list of things Americans can't do but the rest of the world can? The irony of holding up freedom as their cornerstone while keeping the largest inmate population over bullshit without even a trial.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Number one on that list is health insurance being tied to your job. As in, some people literally die if they quit their job. Very freedom, much America.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 0 points 4 weeks ago

HOAs are the devil - even if I could afford property there's no house cheap enough to put up with one.

[–] spazzman6156@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Just ban the fucking HOAs

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

What's the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture? Why not just go live in an apartment then. To me, owning a piece of land to enjoy was kind of the key reason I wanted to own a house in the first place.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah native plants does not mean you have to keep your lawn an overgrown jungle.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 0 points 4 weeks ago

...do you see where you're posting?..thriving verdant habitats are kind of the entire point of a no-lawns community, and while you're free to rail against natural growth within groomed enviroments it's kind of an old-man-yells-at-cloud exercise in futility...

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 0 points 4 weeks ago

I'm guessing they're referring to the empty lawns that are clearly just there for show.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

If it's your yard you should be allowed to have an overgrown jungle if you so wish.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I agree, if only you are controlling invasives, and promoting native plants. Emphesis on controlling invasives.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Just like what ICE are doing you mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What’s the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture?

Dog bathroom.

Where I live, it's a bathroom for other people's dogs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›