this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

6133 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] soc@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Quotes "patent expert" Florian Müller ... just no.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

This is so sad, and bad, and tragic :(

These central standards should be a common good. Pay out the patents with a fair price and move them into the public good. I imagine they already made more than enough money through these patents through HEVC.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't read the linked PDFs in the article, but the article itself doesn't mention what patents AV1 would have broken.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

but the article itself doesn’t mention what patents AV1 would have broken

The article does mention and links them

Dolby is accusing Snap of infringing upon four of its patents: U.S. Patent No. 10,855,99 “Inter-plane prediction”; U.S. Patent No. 9,924,193 “Picture coding supporting block merging and skip mode”; U.S. Patent No. 9,596,469 “Sample array coding for low-delay”; and U.S. Patent No. 10,404,272 “Entropy encoding and decoding scheme.”