News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
This is not white-label Mullvad. This is:
That is not something you trust just because a company tells you to trust it. In a best-case scenario you start with zero trust, and it gets built out from there. (And this assumes Mozilla isn't operating from a trust deficit).
I'm tired of saying and reading this, "if something is free, you are the product" (your data technically).
Firefox is looking very bad lately, AI, "free" VPN, next is crypto and it will become Brave.
This is just not true.
Proton offers a completely free VPN that does not exploit you. I mean, it sucks, and the goal is to convince you to pay, but it is free.
Further, most of the time, even if you pay, you are still the product. As in, they exploit your data nonetheless.
Further, most of the time, even if you pay, you are still the product. As in, they exploit your data nonetheless.
Most, but not all...
Not sure why this got downvoted. Mullvad is a perfect counterexample of the Mozilla service: They've fought like hell to earn their reputation as a trustworthy VPN provider, which is something that every provider must do before they deserve your business.
Probably because I didn't say all. I clearly said most.
If something is free, someone else is paying. And who pays chooses what to eat as the saying goes.
So, is who's paying trusthworthy? And furthermore, is Mozilla trustworthy?
My "free VPN you can trust" shirt is raising a lot of questions already answered by the shirt
I am glad to hear some positive news in tech.
Firefox is becoming more like Brave by the day.