this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69562 readers
174 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:

💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
unruffled@anarchist.nexus
21
Third party cloud provider with no download limit (programming.dev)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by emotional_soup_88@programming.dev to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I frequently share stuff with friends by encrypting both contents and file headers with 7-zip, uploading it to my cloud and letting them download it. However, my cloud provider, Internxt, doesn't let them download beyond 10GB.

Do you know of any cloud provider that doesn't have such limitations?

Edit: I'm already using qbittorrent-nox which to my knowledge doesn't have the ability to create torrents. I'm reading up on seedboxes now.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You could get a Hetzner storage box. They have unlimited traffic, but only allow 10 simultaneous connections.

[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Sweet! Thank you so much! :)

[–] Emi@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Buzzheavier seems to work for me. If you don't need long term storage.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Hmmm, I don’t like that it’s totally unclear how this service is funded.

[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

This seems great! I'll try this before any of the paid options.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

~~https://wetransfer.com/ says no limits, but never tried to uploae anything there. My analog photo developer uses it to share high resolution scans, thats how I learnee about it.~~

Edit: See reply below

[–] paf@jlai.lu 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They have changed their policy last year, not sure it is the best place to put pictures on

"You hereby grant us a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable license to use your Content for the purposes of operating, developing, commercializing, and improving the Service or new technologies or services, including to improve performance of machine learning models"

[–] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Put your stuff in a cryptomator vault and transfer it via we transfer. Send key via signal or other, non wetransfer service.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Whack. Well atleast I got my pictures in an encrypted archive, still sucks tho

[–] Delascas@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you consider the Tor network as a "cloud without the storage" . . then OnionShare does everything you need - with no fixed file size limit.

https://onionshare.org/

[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks! I'll check it out! :)

[–] bright_side_@piefed.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look at syncthing. Encrypted transmission. But requires a client

[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks! This'll be great for my me and my technically knowledgeable pals, but this particular situation requires a more "copy-paste approach".

[–] Mttw_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you specifically need a cloud storage for persistence?

if it's just file transfering, take a look at this list: https://gist.github.com/SMUsamaShah/fd6e275e44009b72f64d0570256bb3b2

[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

By prejudice, I assumed that I need to use cloud storage to share files as big as 50GB, but I really appreciate this list! I'll check it out. :)