this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
3 points (80.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1845 readers
439 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I'm just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned jordanlund@lemmy.world from !transgender@lemmy.blahajzone earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was 'trolling about neopronouns' I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from news@lemmy.world for 'trolling'. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate news@lemmy.world, but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you're welcome to disagree with.

I don't view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they're on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I'm not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don't have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

update

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Every other instance should defederate from .world. Neoliberal fascism is no better than regular fascism.

[–] somename@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah. Why voluntarily get the worst part of reddit moderation?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there? They cooperate with one another, so if you cross one you cross both.

But yeah, doesn’t surprise me. Jordan is the same white dude who said he didn’t support BLM because protests inconvenienced him. He’s a peak liberal Zionist.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 years ago

Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there?

One will bait, then other will ban to maintain the image of propriety

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

Jordan is the same white dude who said he didn’t support BLM because protests inconvenienced him. He’s a peak liberal Zionist.

That stuff was wild

[–] UniversalMonk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there

He was, but if I remember correctly, he had a huge mental breakdown and threatened to commit suicide over zoom, and I think they removed him until he starts feeling better. It was a big deal a few days ago.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate news@lemmy.world, but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

Just something else I found recently

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Oh that would explain a lot lol

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

PTB. I think you are correct in both cases.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just want to add that it seems to me that about 90% of people accused of trolling on here do not themselves think they are trolling. Something to ponder.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everybody is the good guy in their own story.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think this is a related factor but not quite what I’m getting at here.

My understanding of trolling is that it is a deliberate attempt to trigger negative emotional responses and cause trouble. So users should have a good sense of whether they are or are not engaged in trolling.

So either:

A: They are lying about their intentions. B: The community and mods are ascribing ill intentions where there are none. Or C: Different people are using conflicting definitions of trolling.

While A might seem the obvious answer, I think it’s actually far less common than people think. When I go through the histories of people accused of trolling I rarely see clear evidence of it. It’s usually just a person who has a tendency to respond angrily to people they disagree with, or who has a particularly strong disagreement with the community on a particular issue that they feel passionately about.

So I usually chock these cases up to B, and I think this case is a pretty clear example. However I’d also be curious to know if C is at play here, so if you think there is another definition of trolling that differs from mine, please share it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I was the one that submitted the ban, after a number of reports. On the face of it (I am at work, so don't always have time to deep dive), The reports did seem to align with trolling.

I had/have no idea what's going on withe the Jordan Lund thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

Interesting case. Not giving any opinion right now, but as always, !world@quokk.au is an alternative to the LW one.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Really unsurprising considering it involved Israel. News mods usually bend over backwards like the r/worldnews to remove anything slightly critical. Especially when it's calling out hasbara

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah jordanlund do be doing that.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

That checks out for Jordanlund and Lemmy.world, unsurprising and still sad.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

World is an absolute cancer on Lemmy, its filled with ShitLibs who hold on to their Reddit mentality. If Blahaj defederated from world absolutely nothing of value would be lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You shouldn't use your mod account to post political hot-takes. Create another account to do that with unless you think it represents and promotes the community you moderate.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I can take that criticism, I can be quick to throw out a hot take. Though I'm not sure that obfuscation of political leanings of moderators is necessarily a good thing.

If anything it seems like it would be better for transparency to know who's potentially censoring speech and what their opinions are, especially when something as simple as like "being trans" gets considered "political" by people.

load more comments
view more: next ›