this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

pics

28351 readers
440 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Anyone that would grab a Ham's ain't reaching over natty ice tall boys...

[–] JeanValjean@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago

Hamm's the beer refreshing.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's okay for a stray from a broken case to be priced like the Hamms but you cannot legally obscure the label including nutritional facts.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

But you can do it illegally.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Maybe you can't, but this liquor store can.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In some regions, alcohol is regulated differently than food, and does not require similar nutritional or ingredients disclosure.

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

We got a label Nazi here.