this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Games

24871 readers
106 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A three-year fight to help support game preservation has come to a sad end today. The US copyright office has denied a request for a DMCA exemption that would allow libraries to remotely share digital access to preserved video games.

"For the past three years, the Video Game History Foundation has been supporting with the Software Preservation Network (SPN) on a petition to allow libraries and archives to remotely share digital access to out-of-print video games in their collections," VGHF explains in its statement. "Under the current anti-circumvention rules in Section 1201 of the DMCA, libraries and archives are unable to break copy protection on games in order to make them remotely accessible to researchers."

Essentially, this exemption would open up the possibility of a digital library where historians and researchers could 'check out' digital games that run through emulators. The VGHF argues that around 87% of all video games released in the US before 2010 are now out of print, and the only legal way to access those games now is through the occasionally exorbitant prices and often failing hardware that defines the retro gaming market.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Well, time to finally make my own collection to play

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

“No! They’ll enjoy preserving our history to muuuch!!”

They know the dark secret of book preservation. The people preserving the books… gulp READ THEM!

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Libraries facilitate widespread piracy of books, by allowing people to read them without a distribution licence, or even take them home!

This is a clear violation of the DMCA, and thus must be stopped immediately!

[–] radix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Actually explains a lot of decisions by game publishers the last 5-10 years if their official position is that games are meant to collect dust on a shelf rather than being played.

[–] evilcultist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Don’t let them hear why a lot of people go to museums.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

When they kill the games, they no longer make money on them. So playing without paying is not a lost sale, even if the player is corrupt enough to enjoy playing. So there's no problem yeah?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If im reading it correctly only the sharing is prohibited not the preservation.

I can live with that and fight again another day. As long as they still exist in an archive they will see the legal light of day someday(im being optimistic)

The high seas will take care of retro gamers who want to play them im sure, as Gaben says piracy is a service issue.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Given the industry's "you aren't buying, you are renting" mentality.... very, very optimistic.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They really want to force gamers to buy their new games which are pretty much like the old games but now with extra helpings of ads, gambling mechanics and micro transactions on top

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well isn't it just convenient that I don't give a damn what the US copyright office thinks?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Simple solution: Just lend people games that aren't any fun

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Love how the people don't get represented or supported because of corporations and their insatiable greed.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The weird thing is, corporations can't even make any money from these older games. I guess they think that means people who can't play older games will just buy their newer garbage, and yet that's not how it works at all lol people just end up buying indie games instead these days.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

It's about preserving the consumption culture for the mainstream. If playing older games for free was easier and legal, more people that now only play the newest AAA garbage would start doing it, and corpos don't want to risk that culture change, because if it gets big enough it would definitely impact their sales.

Unfortunately not many people know or care about indie games and free games like Beyond All Reason, Shattered Pixel Dungeon, etc. as is.