this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

84782 readers
4885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The uBlock Origin Lite add-on was also accused of collecting user data and running afoul of privacy concerns, which is one of the big reasons why people switch over to the Firefox browser in the first place. Hill [the developer] responded: “It takes only a few seconds for anyone who has even basic understanding of JavaScript to see the raised issues make no sense.”"

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why would anyone even want to use uBlock Origin Lite on Firefox? It's a stripped down version designed to work with the limitations of manifest V3 in chrome.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

My guess is that it's used predominantly by people who own budget smart phones. Having lite versions of apps be available to people who don't use thousand dollar flagships I think is kind of important. However, I intended the post to be informational.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is the lite version more performant?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

On lower end smart phones? It probably just slows the phone down less specifically because of how few processes it uses in the background. But I don't know. I'm not a lite UBO user. It definitely doesn't have the same number of features as the regular variant of UBO though.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

iirc the dev claims its more useful for firefox mobile.

[–] airglow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Any details on that? The full uBlock Origin works well on mobile and I don't see how a lite version with reduced blocking effectiveness could be more useful.

[–] avieshek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Fuck? Might as well use Chromium but am sticking to Safari + AdGuard combo then.

[–] exu@feditown.com 1 points 2 years ago

You can still use the real uBlock Origin instead of the mediocre version Google allows