this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Men's Liberation

2275 readers
2 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, women do their part to contribute to consumerism.

The main reason why guys want money is so they can be more appealing to women.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's not women's fault, that's patriarchys fault for instilling into men on a deep cultural level that they need to make money to "provide" and then capitalism exploiting us workers so hard that that "providing" goal is impossible for a lot of us.

A lot of men deal with that insecurity by entering hustle grindset mindsets. Others get taken advantage of by right wing groups and say it's women's expectations at fault, not understanding that feminism also combats that expectation.

The point being, patriarchy binds us all, men and women with its expectations, and capitalism has made meeting those expectations impossible for a lot of people resulting in a double wombo combo of fucking men over.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not their fault insomuch as they can't think for themselves, I'll agree with you there.

But the agreement stops when you blame the patriarchy over consumerism. No, this generation has been convinced to sell itself out to the lowest bidder. Average women are proud consumers that want to live like instagram models. Any kind of modesty is shunned in their social circles. It's drowned out by "look at this new thing I bought! Please praise me for spending money!"

The sex speaks for itself. Men have a ridiculously easy time getting laid if they have money, even if they're pieces of shit in every other way.

[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should also note. The concept you are referring to as "they can't think for themselves" is called False Consciousness. The idea that oppressive systems like patriarchy and capitalism create this sense that you are acting with complete free will but you actually are following a set of expectations and thoughts and even language that feedback loops on itself in a never ending reinforcement loop.

It's like, your right at the core of what your saying. There is truth there. But you use such anti women language rather than targeting the systems, ideologies and incentives that make both men and women this way.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

complete free will

Hyperbole.

It's a spectrum, for sure. I wouldn't be who I am without the influence of others.

That said, women are way more likely to go along with what the crowd (their peers) is doing than I am. If they disagree with the crowd, they are way less likely to put those disagreements into action than I am.

They cannot think for themselves and it's encouraged by those who refuse to acknowledge it. It's not a problem unique to women, but they suffer from it more than men because women have been conditioned to operate as one unit.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is this community about? I have read the sidebar, but I have not understand it...

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

Put simply, this is a place for criticism of the oppressive gendered expectations placed on men with a focus on intersectionality.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think unfortunately the one theme we are missing and the one most important is solidarity.

In my experience, everyone is focussed on their community and furthering their cause. Rightly so in many cases.

One of the starkest I always felt was when talking about men, children and family courts. When I discuss this online, and even occasionally IRL with feminists. The conversation usually is one of acknowledgement of a problem followed by a cold "we'll support that when we get the things we need". It's a cold brutal unsympathetic view that doesn't help that feeling of isolation and hardens that "us vs them" division. Many feminists don't see that the division sewn is intentional, to stop us uniting and fighting for the rights of the working class. Be it trans rights, gay rights, women's rights, freedom from racial discrimination and men's rights. They are human rights. We have to stand shoulder to shoulder and make our voice heard in support. We also have to hope that folks from other groups will support us.

There is nothing more isolating than fighting in the corners of others and then when the time comes get a cold rejection when they come for you. It pushes folk to these liars and snake oil salesmen from the right. We need to remove that oxygen from the fire so those bigoted views can wither and die. Right now, we're losing that battle. DEI initiatives are being rolled back. Under the guise of fighting positive discrimination, they take more. The destroy awareness of bias, fair selection processes and opportunities for all.

I fear that the true strength of men fighting for fairness is you need to fight for others, extend the olive branch of friendship and then hope when we fight some will join us even if at times it feels like we will fight alone.

I've lost bigoted anti-trans friends who've swallowed the snake oil but to some, I'll always be seen as a part of the patriarchy, purely because of my gender. So will our sons. I hope they don't have the same experience of where they cross from innocent child to evil propagator of the patriarchy despite doing nothing wrong other than being born male and becoming an adult.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you don't know what capitalism is.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or perhaps I just think differently than you.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not think it's worth acknowledging a difference in opinion when the problem at its core is the difference in what those words mean. I don't think we have a difference in opinion. I think he does not know what I or the article mean. If someone could just find the words to tell him in a way he understands then I feel we would be surprised to see that no disagreement existed in the first place.

Now to find the words...

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

I think you may have better luck by adopting the Mr Roger's style of communication.

Telling someone they don't know what a word means probably is going to make them become defensive and bounce off instead of engaging with what you're saying, regardless of you being correct.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think people who ask generalized questions like, "Why does group X have irrational opinion Y about subject Z?" should instead engage with individuals about why they feel a certain way on a specific subject. I think they would find that people make up a full spectrum, opinions are more diverse than the right one and the ridiculous one, and people don't personify two extreme opposing memes.