this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
227 points (95.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3327 readers
639 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Half the joke in the Mamdani rent-freeze is that it doesn't do more than limit the rate of growth of landlord incomes.

If anything, it encourages landlords to start releasing more units that have been withhold from the market as an excuse to raise rents as there's less incentive to constrict supply under a price cap. That's going to mean more cashflow, even if it threatens lower profits per unit.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Source on this here. Indeed the landlord story of "but we can't afford repairs!!" was a lie. On the other hand, doesn't this also imply that we've already got most of the effected units on the market. So we shouldn't expect many more gains?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

You'd need someone with access to a large body of accurate data to survey it and tell us.

One more reason why a guy like Mamdani in the mayorship is useful. He's invested in identifying real estate bottlenecks and unclogging them, whereas an Eric Adams simply doesn't care and a Cuomo would only do the work if he got some kind of kickback.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago

Optimistic if not delusional take.

[–] IvyisAngy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

It's a temp fix to have time to actually figure something else out, most likely.

"Here is immediate action I can do to show I'm doing something while I work on a real solution."

She says optimistically-

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I thought this was false: There is no extension of rent stabilization to additional properties, just maintaining it where it already is? And stabilized rent will goes up, just a bit slower.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Rent freeze is never a long term plan anyways.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

They won't. They'll have to cancel that fourth vacation this year. Oh the humanity.