A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.
If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).
Online resources:
Sibling communities:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)
but it doesn’t make any sense
It's a contraction of two thoughts:
Try
Do it like this
Try to
Is telling someone a different way might help.
There's differences but in spoken language we don't pick words consciously all the time. So don't dwell on the minute differences
just cuz it aint standard grammar doesnt mean it dont make no sense. Grammatical construction and parsability are independent; while grammar is intended to make language easier to parse, it often fails in that. Don't get 'em twisted.
"Try and" is grammatically poorly constructed, but it's actually not quite synonymous with "try to." The meanings of the two phrases are (likely not coincidentally) different in the same sense that the phrases themselves are different - "try and" is sort of informal and casual, while "try to" is a bit more formal and precise.
For instance - you and a friend are moving some boxes, some of which are heavy and/or awkward enough that it takes both of you to move them.
Regarding one box, you say, "I'm going to try and pick it up." The implication then is merely that you're going to check to see if it's something you can carry by yourself.
If, on the other hand, you say, "I'm going to try to pick it up." That carries more of an implication that you're going to make a concerted effort - not just that you're going to check quickly if it's feasible, but that you've established it as a goal toward which you intend to invest effort.
There is an interesting (as usual) two-page discussion on try and in Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. A snapshot is enclosed; apologies for visually impaired people (I'll try to attach a text later). Some of the takeaways:
The use of and between two verbs where to might be expected (to would seem unlikely in some of the constructions) is an old one in English. The OED [Oxford English Dictionary] has examples back to the 16th century; the Middle English Dictionary has examples as far back as the 13th. The verbs most often used in this construction in past centuries were begin, go, take, and come — the last three of which are still so used. Try did not appear as try and until the17th century, when our familiar sense of the word was first established. Interestingly, the earliest example for the "make an attempt" sense in the OED involves the try and construction, so try and may actually be older than try to.
[...]
But try and has actually been common in print for about a century and a half, as the following garland of examples amply shows. You will observe that most of the examples are not from highly formal styles; many are from speech and fictional speech and from familiar letters: [...] These examples show that try and has been socially acceptable for these two centuries but that it is not used in an elevated style.
[...]
The judgment of try and in Fowler 1926 remains eminently sensible today: "It is an idiom that should be not discountenanced, but used when it comes natural."
Woah.