this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
203 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31387 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities have not named the suspect, but Jackson Township police are working with prosecutors to determine charges.

Attempted murder comes to mind.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If this had been a right-wing politician's rally instead, every conservative in the country would be calling for all members of the Democratic Party to be hanged for this heinous crime, regardless of the identity or motive of the perpetrator.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

TBF, the Pedo Party has been advocating for running over peaceful protesters for quite some time now. Well, as long as they are liberals.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.cantonrep.com/story/news/crime/2025/10/20/jackson-township-police-seek-video-after-no-kings-protester-struck/86800921007/

There's more details here, and a statement from the driver. The 77 year old driver claims he doesn't recall hitting anyone, he's not against the protest, and that the police waived him on.

"I didn't even see those people. I was just, you know, driving home and that was it," he said. "I hope I didn't hurt anybody bad or anything like that."

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The pedestrian that got hit wasn't in the road they were off to the side. Even if we believe this guy just made an oopsie, and it wasn't intentional, it's clear this man is a danger behind the wheel. Also, this source is behind a paywall. Edit, went into the pages source code to pull the text of the article.

A 77-year-old motorist who struck a protester at a No Kings rally and then left the scene says he has no recollection of the crash."I don't even remember it happening," he told the Canton Repository in a telephone interview on Oct. 20. "It wasn't anything like on purpose."

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

At the very least, that guy should have his license removed or be forced to have a behind the wheel examination.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But I thought it was the radical left that was the dangerous ones. 🙃

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In all fairness, we don't know the diver's political ideology, and based on another source, it could be a case of an old person that doesn't have the needed faculties to drive safely.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Your optimism is fascinating.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 months ago

If you’ve never had to convince an elderly family member to give up their keys then I envy you. It’s not actually legal to just take them from them, and officials are often slow to act before anyone has been hurt. Looking at all the signs and movement at a protest is the exact time I’d expect an elderly person who shouldn’t be driving to drift into the crowd due to target fixation. It’s also why I don’t stand near open roads at a protest, way more than the fear of a vehicle attack.

Maybe he’s a lying son of a bitch, but I’d bet there’s at least equal chances he’s just old. Almost 80 is too old to be driving for most people.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I mean, he’s pushing 80. My parents are that old, and driving with them is scary.

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

…assault with a deadly weapon, domestic terrorism to name a few more. Hopefully it means they are going to throw the book at this guy while obviously charging him with attempted murder. The DA just needs a minute to figure out how to kick him in the balls. *speculation

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably gonna make him mayor

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's Cleveland...

They're on a 35 year streak of Dem mayors...

But don't let facts get in place of your assumptions

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 0 points 11 months ago

I’m cracking a joke you right wing Simp

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not unless ice is hiring 77 y/o grandpas.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

So you’re saying there’s a chance!