this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
741 points (99.5% liked)

News

39745 readers
2493 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themoken@startrek.website 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Then you get back to the old way of punching holes in a paper ballot and well... Have you ever heard of a "hanging chad"? That shit has issues too.

[–] Fribbizz@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm amazed at the American obsession with voting machines. A properly organised hand count has an amazingly low error rate. I distinctly remember an article about 20 years ago stating, that even the then newest scanning vote counting machines had an error rate higher than hand counting.

Yes "a human" makes mistakes. But multiple humans paying attention at the same time and also keeping each other honest do a tremendously good job.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

that is why conservative depend on the mahcines, they are known to have an error rate that somehow only benefits republicans.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm reasonably sure that the "hanging chads" was only a problem for counting votes for candidates from one of the two parties.

I've heard a legend that in a Scottish parliament election, which claims that a ballot is required only to show "clear preference" that a person drew dicks on all but one candidate, over which was written "not a dick". The vote was counted as it showed clear preference.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The point is, people determined on a particular outcome will find novel ways of ensuring that outcome.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exactly.

Also the tribalism is so strong that the ends (our team winning) justifies the means.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

There are other types of paper ballots.

Here in Sweden you take a ballot from the party you want to vote for, you mark any specific representative if you want, you put the ballot in an envelope, seal it, walk to the election official desk and cast your vote: