this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
271 points (98.9% liked)

PC Gaming

15714 readers
931 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm questioning your logic, not your sources. Thanks, though. Nice dodge.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You made the claim. And I don't believe you are right, unless you can prove it. I'm not the making the claim that investors control the demo to be cancelled. Do you have any prove for your claim?

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're the one making the claim the investors didn't have a play in this. Shouldn't the most obvious/common case be what we default to?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No no, you stated the investors made the decision. I say, I don't believe it without evidence. Until then it didn't happen.

Also BTW, isn't this an indie company without investors at all? So I don't know what you talking about. I do not believe investors cancelled the demo of the game. If you cannot prove it, then I don't believe you.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I made the claim that your hypothesis is irrational and lacking support, and followed up with why. Double down all you like. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You made the claim that their investors made the choice to take the demo away. I asked for evidence, which you still lack and talk like fluff only. I don't believe your claim until you prove it.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That isn't how hypotheses work at all, and to state that I made "a claim" is disingenuous at best. Of the two, yours is the less rational one. Not a judgment of your person, at least initially. 😑

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On what basis do you have a hyptheses? Does the indie company even have investors??? You ignored my previous questions questioning your statement, that is untrue until proven or bringing arguments. You made a baseless claim and now you attack anyone who does not believe your random thoughts without justification.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

jesuschrist. Go outside with this bullshit. Or, ya know: scroll up and read a little. Don't forget to breathe deep. 🤣🖕🏼

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

jesuschrist. Go outside with this bullshit. Or, ya know: scroll up and read a little. Don’t forget to breathe deep. 🤣🖕🏼

See how you dodge the most basic questions, but attack on a personal level. I ask again: Does the indie company have investors or are you pulling nonsense from your asshole and attack people who question your questionable statements?