this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
136 points (100.0% liked)

World News

58520 readers
2920 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

IEDs are cheap and easy. This will go one as long as they want. Nothing can be done about it now.

Once you use mines, you have to assume there is always mines. Oil prices will never go down now. Insurances companies will see to that.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. IEDs are not being used in this war so far

  2. You can not use an IED sea mine. They need to meet some specific engineering requirements to be effective

  3. Evidence indicates this was a projectile attack, not a sea mine as Iran claimed

Once you use mines, you have to assume there is always mines.

Correct, which is the incentive for Iran to claim this is a sea mine. They would like ships to believe the Omani route being used by US CentCom is mined

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago

Im speculating on the possibilities and the futility of the use of force.

It would seriously take very little work to disable a ship with small mines, IEDs, whatever you want to call them. The Cole took serious damage as a war ship with a small craft and IED.

Even the threat, possibility, or sheer greed will drive insurance companies to raise rates.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This wasn't even an IED, it was a projectile per the article.

Iran is a large mountainous country, with tons of places to hide launchers, all within range of the strait. And unlike Afghanistan, it's a very well educated country capable of producing its own sophisticated weapons. There's a reason Russia of all countries turned to them for help against Ukraine.

These aren't improvised explosives, they're carefully engineered. There's a reason why the west has long avoided direct confrontation with Iran, most recognized the tar baby situation a war would cause. They're not some country utterly reliant on cold war stockpiles to conduct war.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

tar baby situation

Wow, that is the first time I’ve seen that word used in the non-slur sense.

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 5 points 2 days ago

I understand. What Im saying is regardless they can keep this up indefinitely through far cheaper means. No amount of destruction can stop it, military intervention cant stop it, nothing can. Until they are done.

[–] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Guess I picked the perfect time to switch to electric