this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
86 points (88.4% liked)

Technology

88751 readers
2790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@upvote.au 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The code they're analyzing is free and open-source though, so they can already use it this way. One of the freedoms of free software is that people can study it and use it for whatever purpose they want.

Isn't it good that they're sharing data with the projects instead of just keeping it for themselves?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 minutes ago

One of the freedoms of free software is that people can study it and use it however they want, for whatever purpose they want

Open source still has licenses, this is incorrect. They are breaking hella licenses left and right. Sorry for the necro, tho.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One of the freedoms of free software is that people can study it and use it however they want, for whatever purpose they want.

Given that Anthropic and OpenAI derive their profits from their models being closed source rather than open source, I don't think they should be assisted in devouring freely-accessible data in their endeavor.

Not all developers may see it this way, but those contributing code to LLMs are training them for free at the expense of career opportunities for fellow developers, all the while Anthropic, OpenAI, and other AI companies rake in money for maintaining access to content that isn't theirs.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think they should be assisted in devouring freely-accessible data in their endeavor

How is this assisting them, though? I see it as two different options:

  1. They use the open-source code without giving anything back; or
  2. They use the open-source code and help improve the project by reporting security issues.

In any case, a fundamental feature of both free and open-source software is that anyone can use it, regardless of if you like them or agree with them or not, without discrimination. You could instead use a license that forbids AI training, but then your code would no longer be free or open-source.