86
Anthropic now offers a free vulnerability-finding service for open-source software
(www.engadget.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2026
86 points (88.4% liked)
Technology
88751 readers
2781 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not free; doing so provides Anthropic with free access to training data for its models.
I think it’s safe to assume that any public code on the internet is already in their training dataset.
At this point anything that is public in general, probably all the posts in the “fediverse” have been taken already
I don't doubt this, as it's trivial to do (by design). You don't even have to scrape anything.
New posts and comments in a Lemmy community (or Mastodon profile or any other ActivityPub-based Fediverse app) get pushed to every server where federation is allowed and at least one person is subscribed to it. You can spin up your own server, subscribe to a bunch of communities, wait a while, and over time your PostgreSQL database will be populated with profiles, posts, comments, etc.
The code they're analyzing is free and open-source though, so they can already use it this way. One of the freedoms of free software is that people can study it and use it for whatever purpose they want.
Isn't it good that they're sharing data with the projects instead of just keeping it for themselves?
Open source still has licenses, this is incorrect. They are breaking hella licenses left and right. Sorry for the necro, tho.
Given that Anthropic and OpenAI derive their profits from their models being closed source rather than open source, I don't think they should be assisted in devouring freely-accessible data in their endeavor.
Not all developers may see it this way, but those contributing code to LLMs are training them for free at the expense of career opportunities for fellow developers, all the while Anthropic, OpenAI, and other AI companies rake in money for maintaining access to content that isn't theirs.
How is this assisting them, though? I see it as two different options:
In any case, a fundamental feature of both free and open-source software is that anyone can use it, regardless of if you like them or agree with them or not, without discrimination. You could instead use a license that forbids AI training, but then your code would no longer be free or open-source.