this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
930 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

50950 readers
1275 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 143 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This should be a web site or YT channel. How to remove such bits without bricking the item.

[–] TheyCallMeHacked@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, OP didn’t claim that the remote wasn’t bricked…

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It works! I was fully prepared for it to not work and explain to my wife why we need to order a new one, but no issue at all lmao

[–] lawks@aussie.zone 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could probably have measured its resistance, then put a plain resistor in its place.

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably, but the nuclear option is always more fun

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

With these people (advertisers), the nuclear option is sometimes the only real option.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

It's fine, you've essentially replaced it with an infinite resistor. With the low currents that a microphone generate, theres just no signal going into the ADC now so it's just silent.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

So if the remote still works then wouldn't that mean there is still a microphone? Or have they gone back to line of sight infrared? Or am I just thinking of the really really old remote tech?

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

...when have remote signals ever used microphones?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not fully related, but early TV remotes used sound rather than IR. The buttons made a distinctive "click" noise, from a mechanical mechanism. The different clicks were detected in the TV and used as input.

Plus side, no batteries to deal with.

Down side, about as (un)reliable as you would expect.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's wild. How did the TVs identify the distinctive sound? That seems like it would be a pretty interesting engineering trick.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believe it was old school analogue electronics, but I'm speculating there.

I just looked it up, it was ultrasonic signals. The main one was the Zenith Space Command.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Cool, thanks! No problem. I understand it was analog electronics and using an ultrasonic signal makes sense, but what I wondered about was how did the receiving end (the TV) differentiate between the signals for the different buttons and then decide to execute different procedures based on that. Still pretty interesting in any case.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Speculating, but I would guess they applied a band pass filter to it. You can then either take a simple threshold value, or look for a rapid change and trigger off that. 4 buttons means 4 sets of filters, each tuned to a different frequency.

That said, the analogue electronics engineers of yesteryear were insanely competent and making analogue circuits do interesting things to save money or space.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, that makes sense, thanks! Totally agreed on those old school engineers being insanely competent and creative.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Randomly this appeared in my feed.

https://youtube.com/shorts/Qpyd7TsH14Y

Doesn't say anything about the receiver side, but shows the mechanism quite well.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Oh, awesome, thank you. Very interesting and very creative. No batteries!

The microphone would only be used for voice control. So that would fail, but buttons would still work normally.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

It's a smart remote, they use bluetooth or IR as a fallback. The microphone is only for voice control.

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Looking up which part to nuke took an hour, but anything to calm down my paranoid ass haha

[–] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Not paranoid, sane and careful for today's world.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Oh good, he fell for the decoy"

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could you share your knowledge here? I clicked this thread expecting to find instructions to help us follow your advice.

[–] yxc999@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

While it’s not always the case, try to look for a 2x4 silver rectangle with a hole in it like the one on my finger. The casing is to isolate it from the nearby radio waves and the hole to let sound through.