this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

88734 readers
2868 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"This commentary is styled in the form of the “Warning to Humanity” series, a series of scientific declarations about the environmental crisis facing the planet that was initiated by a 1992 “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity” (Union of Concerned Scientists, Citation1992). It calls for transformative approaches to smart cities and urban technology". (...) "Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship, this article establishes the need for three paradigm shifts necessary to guide future smart city innovation:

(1) by arguing for a transition from efficiency-driven models to nature-positive and climate-positive approaches that require systemic reforms in regulatory, economic, and governance frameworks;

(2) by highlighting the need to reconcile positivist urban science with constructivist epistemologies in urban studies with the goal of strengthening the value of local and Indigenous knowledge in creating more inclusive, just, and context-sensitive urban governance;

(3) by exploring a posthuman shift in design, which advocates for more-than-human perspectives that recognize the agency and needs of non-human life in cities. These paradigm shifts provide a conceptual foundation for rethinking the role of smart cities and urban technology in fostering more desirable futures that are oriented toward environmental regeneration, multispecies justice, and long-term planetary well-being".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hohombe@szmer.info 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A call to free the minds of public officials from the grip of “smart business” lobbyists. More democracy and broader horizons for life—both literally and figuratively.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A call to whom? Who is going to read this? This is just masturbatory in-group status seeking.

[–] hohombe@szmer.info -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've read it, along with a little over 2,500 other people.
I view both of your comments the same way: as a display of cynicism. Thank you for your attention, but I'm not looking for it from people who write comments like that.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's not cynicism so much as frustration that my side is more interested in being smugly intellectual than actually putting forward convincing arguments to the public.

Why can't people see the need to reconcile positivist urban science with constructivist epistemologies in urban studies with the goal of strengthening the value of local and Indigenous knowledge in creating more inclusive, just, and context-sensitive urban governance? Are they stupid?

Edit: I guess this is for people in academic urban studies. Which does not include me, or 99% of the people that live in cities.

[–] hohombe@szmer.info 0 points 1 month ago

Well, thanks for your willingness to try to understand what's going on here. I'll be back tomorrow.