this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2871 readers
15 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So in the last years i've usually mainly been reading books on my e-reader, and it's true that it's quite convenient (and potentially cheaper too), i won't deny that.

But recently, as i was travelling, on a whim i decided to buy some physical books again, and man, there's just something about holding an actual real book in your hand that is just irreplaceable.

It's such a satisfying feeling just to hold and open one, and such a wonderful reading experience to turn real pages. Electronic devices just feel so cold and sterile where physical books feel warm and homey. Even the woody smell... I had almost forgotten how in love i am with paper books.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rylo@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have a list of books I plan on buying physically, even if I have them in my digital library already. The most important criteria I use is whether I'd want to re-read them, whether I'd want friends and family read them, and whether I think I'd want my future kids to read them. There is just something about having a lot of books around when growing up, I always looked up at my parents bookshelves and pondered at the different covers, titles and authors. Some books I was "allowed" to read, some I was too young or inexperienced for, and it was always exciting after one or two years to finally hear "You are probably ready for this one now", and so forth, until I started buying my own books.

I don't think my love for reading would be what it is if my parents instead let me browse their digital repository of e-books on the laptop.

At the same time, there are a lot of books that I know I'm not gonna read again, like crime thrillers and such. A lot of fiction in general is entertaining when you read it but doesn't necessarily hold the same long term value imo. There are many non-fiction books that I come back to time and time again, this is rarely true for the works of fiction I do keep. Purely subjective of course, but lets just say there is more Lenin than Tom Clancy in my bookshelves.

[–] devils_dust@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 5 days ago

lets just say there is more Lenin than Tom Clancy in my bookshelves

I always ask every person who is in the habit of reading if their tastes moved more towards "non-fiction" (as an umbrella term for anything that is not fiction) as they got older, because I definitely feel the same.

It is a bit difficult to find the time to read more demanding fiction, even the stuff I'd like to read, but I feel like I always make the time for reading theory or other technical subjects that interest me.

I almost feel as if this is somehow capitulating to capitalism in a way, since this type of literature feels like it is "more useful" than straight fiction.

Thoughts on this, comrades?

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, growing up with books makes a big difference.