this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
282 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

87426 readers
4262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically those are all bug fixes.

“But it is what it is: the new normal with a lot of fixes, many of them due to review by various AI tools.”

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The same way Windows is "fixing bugs" with AI? Large volumes of dubiously tested code is never a good idea

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Linus's post only says the bug were found using an AI tool, not fixed using AI.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago

No, in this case the AI is finding the bugs and humans are at least reviewing the code and, anecdotally at least, in a lot of cases still writing it in the first place.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago

Linus is not a fool

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The same way Windows is “fixing bugs” with AI? Large volumes of dubiously tested code is never a good idea

I think the point is the bugs are being FOUND with AI. Not fixed with AI.

It's basically the same concept as open source in general. IE the average layman hears open source and they think "oh so every moron, malicious person etc... can add his own back doors into the code", of course not, the official version is gated and reviewed. What's happening is AI is basically serving as millions of idiots looking through the code for security flaws, and it's finding them. Which then means the humans fixing it need to go into overdrive to fix them before they become zero days.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're absolutely being "fixed" with AI too.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst

It was a whole thing back and forth that Linus finally ruled on. It's supposed to be under the purview of a specific human ultimately but as we've seen with countless other projects people get lazy fast with LLMs and testing and review does slip. I trust Linux overall to be better than many other projects yes, but to state AI is not doing development too when it's very much allowed and discussed is blind to what's been happening in the project.