General_Effort

Ich weiß auch nicht, warum du damit angefangen hast.

Soweit ich das mitverfolge, wird hier überwiegend AI Slop runtergewählt, also hauptsächlich KI-Memes.

Das ist ja auch eine interessante Beobachtung. Brigaden, die KI-Generiertes automatisch hochwählen, findest du nicht.

LinkedIn

Mir ist noch nicht in den Sinn gekommen, Lemmy als Gegen-LinkedIn zu begreifen. Hmm. Dass die (Selbst-)Vermarkter auf LI Bullshit schaufeln, ist nicht neu. Das ist keine KI-Sache. Sollte man vielleicht Leuten zeigen, die sich überlegen Geisteswissenschaften zu studieren.

Ändert aber nix daran, dass man hier auch in einer Bullshit-Blase ist. Keine Ahnung, was das antreibt.

Lemmy ist voll von anti-KI-Bullshit, der fleißig hochgewählt wird. Anti-Bullshit gibt's hier nicht. Als Kollektiv sind die Poster hier auch nicht informiert genug, um zu vernünftigen Einschätzungen zu kommen.

Wow. Ein Blogpost von vor über 2 Jahren.

*Screenshot is page 54 of the "Claude Mythos Preview Card".

https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/8b8380204f74670be75e81c820ca8dda846ab289.pdf

It's really only a minority, or else the world would not work. Think how the theory of evolution gained mainstream acceptance, despite resistance by fanatics who had support by society,

More substantial info: https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/

(In case someone has been living under a rock in the last 48 hours. Anthropic's new model "Mythos" has been finding a lot of new vulnerabilities. This is about patching one.)

Tears of joy, no doubt. No wait. Java...

They are just making it up. It's just nonsense.

These copyright claims are governed by the DMCA in the US. Platforms like Youtube that allow User Generated Content have a safe harbor provision. They are usually not liable for content that users post. Without that, the internet as we know it would be hard to imagine. But when someone reports a copyright violation, the platform must take it down, or else becomes liable. Then it could be sued for damages, as if the platform had pirated the content.

Posters can submit a DMCA counter-notice. At that point, the copyright owner must either sue the poster, or the content goes back up (within 14 days). It is quite suspicious, that there is no mention of that in the OP.

However, copyright owners have sued Youtube, alleging that they did not do enough to take down pirated content. This did not go so well for Youtube. Eventually they were forced to create "Content ID". Owners register and upload their content. Youtube continuously scans for that content in videos posted by users. What happens when there is a match depends on the assumed owner. They can choose to have it taken down, or to get the ad money, for example. SNAFUs are pretty common, especially with classical music. It also has no regard for Fair Use, but content owners hate that anyway.