While most Australians receive the bulk of their income as wages or salaries, much of the increase in wealth for high net worth individuals comes from the rising value of assets they already own. Increases (or decreases) in the value of these assets are known as unrealised capital gains (or losses).
Suppose you buy a share for $1 in 2025. By 2026, its value has increased to $3. The share has generated a capital gain of $2. If you sell the share, you realise the gain. If you continue to hold it, the gain remains unrealised.
For billionaires, unrealised capital gains on shares in companies, real estate and other valuable assets, such as artwork or classic cars, account for a large share of the growth in their wealth.
For example, over the past 10 years, the wealth of Australia’s 200 richest people has grown from $197 billion to $707 billion, according to the Australian Financial Review’s Rich List.
From an economic perspective, these unrealised gains increase a person’s purchasing power just as wages do for workers. The key difference is how they are taxed, with unrealised capital gains receiving preferential treatment.
"unrealized assets" absolutely can be taxed, i.e. we know how much a company share is worth even if you didn't sell it yet, because there's something called the stock market where other people agree on the current value of the shares. so we can use that as a reference value.
and these other people have a high incentive to get the estimate correct, because there's lots of money to be made from estimating a more accurate valuation.
Spot on. Some countries in Europe do this already, although it is controversial.