this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
210 points (99.5% liked)

News

38807 readers
1511 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York can’t ban federal agents from wearing face coverings or require that they wear visible identification, a federal judge ruled Monday.

The ruling comes after a federal judge earlier this year blocked a similar law in California that was enacted after the Trump administration aggressively worked to increase immigration arrests.

For the Northern District of New York, U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino wrote that while New York “appears to be well-intentioned in its pursuit of transparent policing,” that’s not what the court is deciding.

“The issue now before the Court is about constitutionality—not transparency or preferable policy decisions,” she wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sadly, blue wall of silence will surround this problem. Police will not intervene

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago

There's enough cops watching ICE have no guard rails and they are honestly probably jealous. The cops that are dumb enough to wear Punisher logos without any sense of irony.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm not so sure. These fat, untrained losers ICE hires might not register as in-group to all cops. If the state administration will protect cops from the government, I think there will be more than a few willing to take ICE on.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Have you seen cops at anti-ICE protests? Have you seen police unions putting out statements of offense over an armed and poorly trained secret police force from outside the community racially profiling residents and breaking the 4th amendment? Have you seen conscientious cops resigning from police forces that support and cooperate with ICE?

No. There's no police outage at the outrageous perversion of law enforcement. If their theoretical ideals and beliefs in justice meant anything they'd be the profession most upset about this.

In reality, half are MAGA already and the rest don't think of the job as serving a higher ideal. Ask any of these assholes to do something legally questionable (legally being what these deferential courts say) and you'll get complaints about not politicizing their job, all while they stand watch to make sure the citizens of their community don't make life difficult for the air dropped army cosplayers from the organization using Nazi slogans.

They don't even need to put themselves in legal jeopardy. They could be out there right now pulling over every car without a license plate driving around suspiciously in a residential neighborhood. They could be IDing, every one of them to "verify they were federal agents" so all this lawbreaking is ok, requiring them to unmask so you can match their face to the ID, and recording it all on their body cameras. They get plenty creative about how to harass citizens. But they don't do anything like that to ICE. Because ACAB.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuinely, I hope you're right.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I’m with you, not holding my breath but it would be cool to see these bigots have to fight the police apparatus they made so unimpeachable

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Not only that but it's the kind of thing you can try to affect, to make fewer and fewer cops think of them as their in group.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More will start the more psychopathic they get

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Someone doesn't understand how cops work...