politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I have to say, that doesn't seem unreasonable. My understanding is that one can get a terminal diagnosis long before one becomes too sick to work.
Imagine just offering up this opinion of your own free will
It's helpful to be reminded that, yes, there are people out there like that. Learn to detect them early on.
Fuck off
If I find out that I'm terminally ill, I'm spending my days doing shit I enjoy with the people I love
Your attitude is precisely what makes 'Murica such a shit hole
Mmmmm I’ve got a few people I’d need to have words with before going out, personally.
Back to work, wagie
Yes, and if you're able to work and only have months to live, that's the best use of your time. For the benefit of society, of course. But also to keep your dignity and not be a freeloader. Without those 200 or so extra hours of work, the share market might dip. Or worse, you might get to spend some time with friends or family. Or going to medical appointments.
/s
"Hey honey, I've got 3 weeks to live. I'm off to the pizza hut to do the night shift of delivering pizzas so I can get the healthcare I need to work at the Pizza Hut to deliver pizzas. Thanks orange man!"
And where do you draw the distinction between being too sick and not?
The same place you do for people without a terminal diagnosis - you have to have a system for doing that anyway.
Yeah cause that totally works for neurological diseases and disorders that dont show symptoms generally until 10-20 years after diagnosis.... next up chemotherapy patients still have motor function! Meaning they can run a register hurdurrr
Can’t wait for the exciting new frontier of paying disabled people below minimum wage
They already do this.
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/workers-with-disabilities/overview
Ah of course. Satire is dead
I hope someone you love gets that diagnosis so that you can spend the days counting down their demise while they slave away at a job they HAVE to do.
I don't think it matters if you're too sick to work. That's treating people as existing solely for your own benefit, to be exploited.
What does matter, IMHO, is what your expected timeline is. At one time, HIV could've been considered a terminal diagnosis. It couldn't be treated, it would always advance to AIDS, and eventually that would cause your death. But that was likely to be 10+ years away.
If you've got less than a year to live, the government should cover your fucking medical care, no exception. Well, maybe the ultra-rich, but I'm sure they'd find a way around it anyway.
What do you mean by that in this context? I don't think Medicaid pays for people's healthcare in order that they might work (at least not in this context). It is rather more like a charity program, with the associated reasoning being that people who could work instead of accepting charity should.
Shut the fuck up and get back to work!
Accurate username.
Do you want your Air Traffic Controller, Pilot, firefighter, paramedic, surgeon, or Engineer in charge of your power plant working with a terminal cancer diagnosis?
Knowing you're dying affects your ability to focus, causes depression, and a whole host of other neurological effects that mean you're way more likely to make mistakes, and way less likely to care about other people depending on how the news affects you.
This is likely to kill more people who didn't have to die than it would save the government monetarily. If I have to work to get Medicaid while I'm terminally ill, I'll happily just not pay taxes for that and use that money for my own care when the need arises.
The government already can come in after you die and take all your assets to pay back what you took from Medicaid. This is literally just so they can take more from your loved ones once you're gone.
For the record, I don't want people in low wage or low stakes jobs working while terminally ill either. I'm just illustrating how short sighted your view is.
I don't want my fucking plumber working if they have a terminal disease