this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
269 points (95.3% liked)

politics

30336 readers
2221 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he's fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn't just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It's not time to defend him no matter what, because there's still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its 100% credible. She's got texts and e-mails with friends and a therapist from the time period.

Graham is done.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. The therapist ones are recent. They have a few chat messages from friends, but only from people whose names Politico didn't disclose. She explicitly said she deleted most of her texts.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I watched the interview and I didn't make those conclusions. Its more than credible enough to just believe it. And I don't know that the fine detail matters. Graham said there was no more coming out and this came out. He has categorically denied it, but that was before the interview. I'd be surprised if he hasn't stepped down before the end of the night. It could be an outright lie (I dont think it is, I think its fully credible), and it won't matter now.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well I'm going off the actual text in the Politico and NYTimes articles. If you want to cite a video, can you provide a time stamp? I don't have time to watch a 25 minute long video.

And the fine details do matter. Again, because we're dealing with what has an extremely high probability of being a political hit piece.

And Graham saying nothing more is coming out isn't damning at all. She herself claims Platner didn't remember the event. Even if she's telling the truth, Platner would have been completely honest when he said he didn't think anything else was coming out. She's claiming he was blackout drunk and had no memory of the event.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I think this was while you were engaged in the thread, Jake Tapper did an interview with the accuser. Also, can we just say Jake Tapper is also a piece of shit? He's like, goading certain responses out of here. I don't think she has an axe to grind here but Tapper sure does. Tapper also used language like "let him r*** you" and like, come the fuck on CNN. Like what the actual fuck.

Its gonna be a while before the clip chimps get their hands on this, but it was a CNN interview, so here is CNN's sub 3minute clip of the interview: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=c2hyYJRhzhk

Longer form if you've got 10 minutes: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=Hz5Nv4-DAnU

The accusation is that Graham broke into her house black out drunk and r****d her.

And the fine details do matter. Again, because we’re dealing with what has an extremely high probability of being a political hit piece.

Not really. Not in politics and not in the broad superficial strokes of the US media apparatus. There are so many moving parts to a political campaign, and especially with a grass-roots, anti-corporate, anti-AIPAC campaign, its a massive blow, a death blow. Its 10PM Maine time? Platner either drops out in the next hour or tomorrow morning.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, can you provide any evidence of what you claimed - that in a video she claims to have contemporaneous therapist records? I watched the short one, but it doesn't support your claims.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, if you are doing fucking lazy or deeply committed to not engaging with the story, why the fuck should I be bothered to give you anything more than a few clips to check out?

You want to know why I said what I said, show some curiosity and go watch the full interviews. I'm not the one making claims without having taken in that information, you are..

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Here is a source that proves all my claims. I cannot provide time stamps. You'll just have to take my word for it. If you don't watch it all the way through, you're fucking lazy.

[–] KatakiY@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He provided a three minute video. You've spent more time shit posting

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

They watched the short video and it didn't have the information being referenced.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago

show some curiosity and go

Here is the thing. You are being extraordinarily defensive about something that is at least credible enough to believe the accuser at face value. There is a primary source you can engage with which I've provided, and you just want to tut-tut and walk away. You've obviously had enough time to spend easily 2 hours plus in this thread. You could have listened to the entire interview by now.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"TropicalDingDong sexually assaulted me five years ago and I had texts to prove it but I deleted them all. See, look at these emails I exchanged with my therapist last week about it. If you don't believe me, just listen to my anonymous friends who I confided in at the time."

See how credible that is?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look dude I took Graham at his word that there was nothing more to come out. If he's right, and he tucks his heels in and fights, he'll win.

Right now it looks like she's a credible accuser. The timeline, the MO, the story, the consequences, its all in alignment. And we can compare that with a not-credible accuser, like 3 weeks ago, via the NYT, which didn't have the corroborating evidence this does.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

All I know is that the state of israel has a vested interest in preventing him from getting elected, as do the centrist democrats, and the entire republican party.

And this woman waits till now to bring this up? Smells like a hit job to me. Especially when you consider that this is Politico...