this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
306 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

85985 readers
4046 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
306
Tested: Microsoft just debloated Windows 11 Search without Bing, and it's crazy fast (www.windowslatest.com)
submitted 1 week ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

is it ripgrep level of "crazy fast" tho?

[–] ksh@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

We all know the answer to this.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's far faster. Ripgrep has to search every file exhaustively at query time. Windows Search indexes every file at write time (or a background job) so the search results are near instantaneous ... at least, that's how it used to work. I don't know what happened to it over the past 5-10 years.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why can't ripgrep? "Everything" search does this. https://www.voidtools.com/downloads/

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everything could do this but sometimes you don't want to.

i.e. you're trading off the background indexing resource usage for instant search results. On a consumer PC where you're constantly on it and searching for stuff that's worth it, on a remote server that you're logging into to bug fix but is normally just running a headless application it may not be.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

NTFS drives have an index built-in. It's not fit for search, but it comes with a journal and you can update a search index incrementally. That's what Voidtools Everything does. It's very fast and doesn't need a background index. (I assume modern Linux drive formats can do the same)

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

I would argue it used to be faster since it was indexed.

Not going to install win 11 to find out if it's any good again. But in 7 it was.