this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
245 points (99.2% liked)

politics

30240 readers
2386 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran says fees to cover cost of managing waterway will come into effect at end of 60-day negotiation period

Iran has announced plans to introduce a system of maritime fees in the strait of Hormuz in two months, after the 60-day period of negotiation that has been triggered by the signing of the memorandum of understanding.

Tehran, claiming a historic victory over the US, said the strait was under its control and a European plan for a naval mission to escort ships though the strait would not be welcome.

The warning came as the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, had said Israel “will maintain the security zone in south Lebanon as long as our security needs require it”, referring to the more than 600 sq km of Lebanese territory occupied by Israeli troops along the border.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They use chemicals going through Hormuz.

A PCB precursor is an example.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lots of things do, but luckily enough solar PCBs are so small and simple that changing their supply chain would add a negligible cost while the transition to solar as a whole will bring in enough savings to offset that and more.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think it's that simple, they also need transformers to make AC and those need more PCBs, various electronics also need helium to engrave the wafers, it's not really that simple.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

New helium wells opening up in Tanzania soon.

As a Helium One investor, I'm quite excited for it

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We could go down the rabbit hole of each individual component and get into a nitpicky argument, but I'm not interested in doing that.

Instead I'm going to make the claim that solar panels themselves are so cheap now that if the US transitioned most of its power grid to solar it would pay for itself within our lifetime. Independence from petrostates is achievable. It's a policy choice that it hasn't happened yet.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I generally agree except the part about independence from petrostates : the US is now a net exporter of fossil fuels with the fracking boom, they're intervening over Hormuz only for those specific plants making those niche byproducts and because market prices are related to local US prices (and due to Israeli pressure).

About your solar grid argument, another that is, in my opinion, valid this time why the switch hasn't happened is that when switching grids, all options should be studied. The least polluting option I saw is a mix between solar, wind and nuclear. With as few batteries as possible and load shifting maximization.