this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
247 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

85677 readers
3541 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'd like to see the data for that 49% of adults. It feels high and I wouldn't put it past some companies to report mandatory AI bots as increased use by customers. I know Amazon requires it to do returns now, and I've had more than one site bring up the chat bot if you wanted access to content.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

it's here

it's "% of U.S. adults who say they ever use AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini or Copilot". They didn't ask about regular use, it's the total number of people who have ever used a chatbot in any capacity. So with that framing 49% doesn't surprise me. Of course the percentage of people who have ever used a chatbot is going to go up over time.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Of course the percentage of people who have ever used a chatbot is going to go up over time.

Yes, and crucially, it never goes down.

It's like asking: "do you use a motor vehicle?" And then counting everyone who has ever been in a car, a truck, a bus, or potentially even a train as a yes. It plainly conflates active users with exploratory or incidental users.

The only reason to do such things is to inflate numbers because being honest about them makes it look bad.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yup. I used Gemini like a year before it took off back when Google first sent out testing invites, because I wanted to see what it could do. That's very different from active use, but this survey would count me as a regular user.

Although since Google shows me an AI summary whenever I search now, maybe I count as an active one anyways... along with everyone else who uses Google.

[–] LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Unfortunately A LOT of less tech-savvy people absolutely love AI chatbots. All of my girlfriend's family regularly ask ChatGPT random shit multiple times a day. Many of my friends have taken to using ChatGPT for every single online enquiry. It's a worrying world.

[–] walden@wetshav.ing 5 points 3 days ago

It sort of makes sense, though. Google Search has been a hot pile of garbage for years. Researching something simple used to be quick and easy, but now you have to sift through endless SEO trash websites to find half an answer (or use a better search engine).

People go for the path of least resistance.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

my bro who ins tech, been laid off since 2023, going through a " late 30s midlife crisis) uses this all the time.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dumb but efficient people are gonna take over the world now that they have instant access to intelligence. They were already in charge but it's gonna get boring

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

It isn't intelligence, though.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Number seems low to me....

People are using AI all the time without knowing it. Almost everyone is using the AI summary feature on every google search (i'm sure those summaries arent generated every time, so does it count as AI use if it's a re-used result?). There's probably a bunch of AI bullshit enabled on your phone you dont know about.

My guess would be closer to 90%... only a small minority of people are truly tech savvy enough to know what's going on under the hood, and truly dedicated 100% anti-AI to avoid using those sites/features.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i'm sure those summaries arent generated every time

Why? I'm not sure what you mean. If you re-run your search with the same terms, you get a different response.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I rarely use google, and i never tried redoing a search to see if the summary changes... i just assumed the summary was cached and re-used if you or someone else makes a similar search...

thats wild if they're burning up gpu time on EVERY query

We are fucked