this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

4642 readers
1 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (7 children)

For the life of me I don’t understand why people are putting them anywhere before every rooftop is covered with them. Roofs are dead space and unlikely to have debris issues (at least compared to a railway).

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Or in parking lots. It would also have the added benefit of providing cover for cars.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 4 months ago

I don't think they're a lot of surface parking on Switzerland like in the US

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You need some serious concrete and/or steel hardware to build a carpark roof that can hold the solar panels without easily being damaged by cars or broken by strong wind, so that massively inflates the costs. If you had a state owned company producing cheap solutions for this it could work though.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, a lot of the places around me are putting up these massive structures. I don't know why they don't just install open sided polebarns

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Every parking lot needs approval of the location, its probably a a pain in the ass, and would disrupt parking while being built which impacts sales (or will be perceived to anyway). If this worked, you only need to deal with a small group of people for a very large space.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile...it's mandatory in France for any newly built parking lot over a certain size.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Thats a good way to get it to start happening as it avoids a lot of the problems

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

I do occasionally see parking lots with solar here in LA! So it is happening in some places.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 0 points 4 months ago

It's companies trying to make a quick buck. Obviously every home should have them first and all newly built homes should be built with solar efficiency in mind.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Hell parking lots are massive areas of dead space, build them over the damned things, it'll help against the heat island affect and give shade.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Deployment on rails is dirty cheap. Can be highly automated and you have highvolt power line just a few meters away.

If you put solar upon your roof, 2/3 rhe costs are labor costs.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Cheap if you only count the cost of plopping them down and walking away, the train could kick up enough dust and debris that efficiency is impacted significantly more than installing them on a roof would have been, necessitating installing new ones sooner.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago

It’s all theory. That’s why I think it’s worth a try and learn the facts.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

What if the train runs a street sweeper brush behind it to clean them off every time?

[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

Yes exactly, it makes no sense!

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

You can lay them down and remove them again and also clean them with automation. There are power lines nearby as well as consumers, electric trains.

Installing on roofs is manual labor and needs electricians. Which is why you see so many solar farms by the roadside.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Roofs are actually not that great. Installation is expensive because you are working at height. Roof angles and directions are also not ideal on many houses. Compare it to a simple installation on a field: You just take some corn field, stop growing corn there and can put your panels on some cheap holders and you're good. You can access and service them without the danger of falling from a roof. You can install them on an industrial scale instead of a few square meters on every single roof. You need only one electrical installation.

People love to cry about the loss of agricultural space, but currently we are growing a lot of corn to convert it to fuel or to put it into biogas installations. If you convert those field to solar, you will get more energy from them. And the loss of a big monoculture that is using a lot of pesticides is also great.

[–] livligkinkajou@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can still grow stuff in them with agrivoltaics. You don't have to lose the productive land below it

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago

And even if you do not: It's better for the environment to not grow corn and just have some grass underneath the solar panels.