News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I personally loved it. It was its own contained side story like Solo was. It showed some evolution for Grogu and Mando was a bad ass.
The biggest complaint I see is that it’s a “longer episode of the show.” Yeah, but so is any Star Trek movie, the Sponge Bob movie, the Simpson’s movie, etc. Anything that’s a TV product that goes to the theater is just a long version of that thing because we are used to the thing on TV. That said, this did not bother me at all as it was enjoyable.
All of the love they added through shots that were based on original Star Wars concept art were very enjoyable. I loved the use of stop motion that was a nod to things like the Rancor from RoTJ. It was filled with awesome creatures, droids, and a connection to the Clone Wars.
It was the first movie I’ve seen in cinema for a long while and I was pretty damn happy with it. I went with a friend who is picky about movies and even he only had a couple of gripes.
Judging by the comments here I’m assuming that, a lot like Solo, people want it to be bad. Glad I ignored that ‘it must fail’ attitude when Solo came out as well, it was actually pretty decent.
The Simpsons movie had stakes and emotional impact. The Alaskan scene with Marge leaving Homer? Nothing in Mando comes anywhere close to it.
I'd say most of the star trek movies did as well. The first one, while being the strangest of the bunch, hit you several times. The Wrath of Khan is rife with it, the nature of family. Even when they retconned Spock back in the next movie, there was weight there.
Mando by all accounts was placid, shapeless pew pew nothing, with some cute scences and some bright flashing action scences, but with near zero growth or conflict for the titualar characters. They could have pushed the show forward, given Grogu more independence, really redefined the relationship that shows how kids grow from and away from their parents, but no. They split up, have a cute thing, have am action thing, then nothing of impact happens and it just resets to "man and baby go about their day."
If you want to take your media to another medium, it should be to do something with it, something that matters, even if its only for a couple of hours. It should have some impact when it shirks its everyday bonds. That did not happen here.
Dude, if you think the Simpsons had stakes but the mandaloroan and grogu didn't I think you're just biased against star wars.
spoiler
The entire second half of the movie was about Din as a father definitely not going to outlive his adopted son, Grogu as a child struggling against the death of his father, and Rotta struggling to reject a toxic family that didn't want to let him go.That’s a great opinion. We see things differently.