this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
496 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Populism isn't apathetic. Again, just the opposite. Populists are activists, practically by their nature.

I didn't say that populism was apathetic. What I said is liberalism causes the apathy which populism rises out of in response.

Call it a technique then. But national media and the political elite blaming migrants, religious minorities, and social progressives for economic woes is nothing new.

I mean that's just conservatives in a liberal democracy.

You're thinking of what you see on the nightly news as the sum total of all activity.

I just think you're underestimating the size of the US population. Blm was the largest sustained protest, counting all those who participated in protest over 2 years was estimated between 15 and 26 million. So somewhere between 5-8% of the total population, and those included large amounts of people who are not normally politically active.

The same year Rosa Luxembourg was assassinated after leading the Sparticus Uprising. Two years after the Russian Revolution kicked off next door.

Again..... I'm not claiming there isn't anyone participating in revolutionary activity, just that they are an outlier compared to the vast majority.

What the Nazis achieved was an effective paramilitary that could operate with impunity in a country that was in the grip of a low key civil war.

Yes.... These outliers could operate because the vast majority of the public were apathetic about their own government.

Again, that's simply not true. The Beer Hall Putsch of '23 was in Munich, not Berlin. The Hamburg Uprising happened that same year, in an event known as German October (intended to be a parallel to the Russian October Revolution six years earlier). Blutmai, in '29, was in Berlin, but it was far from the only event leading up to the '33 dictatorship.

I was specifying the leftist clashing with fascist in the streets. Berlin was the cultural hub of most leftist movements.

There were over 3000 strike actions in 1918. How many of those were organized by right leaning parties?

Parties hadn't developed yet in 1918..... It wasn't a democracy yet. The general strikes in 1918 were mostly against the war and led to the fall of the German empire. Of course there weren't right leaning parties, the right at that time would have been working for the kaiser.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Parties hadn’t developed yet in 1918…

Where do you get this stuff?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

There were socialist anti empirical parties and conservative pro imperial parties, but the conservative parties that would function and form into conservative democratic parties and into fascist parties had not yet developed.

You asked how many of the strikes were coordinated by the right in 1918, which wouldn't make any sense as the right at that time were pro empire, which wouldn't be striking to end the war or the empire.