this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)

Books

8031 readers
36 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I read that one and thought it was only mildly amusing because of the setting. The mystery itself wasn't that interesting. Is the first book the runt of the litter or are all of them like that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They're all like that imo. The mysteries aren't very good from a modern perspective.

They're worth reading - if you're into it - for the setting, the 19th Century prose and the historical creation of the Sherlock archetype

But nah. I read them all when I was a teenager and liked them well enough, then reread last year and was pretty unimpressed with them

There's some better ones - I'm fond of the hound of the baskervilles, and some of the short story ones are good like the red headed league

But some real dumb stuff too. Like when footprints suggest a child but Holmes knows it's actually an African Pygmy fella.