Not having a visual reference would mean their experience of visual input would be distinct from ours, but concluding that it doesn’t happen at all is a stretch.

It literally would...

Because of the type of blindness they're talking about...

You don't understand anything else, because you're still trying to talk about any sort of visual impairment

I'm sorry I can not explain this in a way you can understand, but I've also lost all motivation to try with anything else at this point.

You'll need to find someone else

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

It literally would... Because of the type of blindness they're talking about...

An article talking about something doesn't make it true. "Because of the type of blindness we're talking about" doesn't explain anything, and that kind of 'trust me bro' blanket pseudo-rationalization doesn't scratch the surface of how we'd be able to understand the perceptions of someone who's preceptive foundation is fundamentally different from our own.

But keep telling me how that doesn't mesh with the article.